Authors/Ockham/Summa Logicae/Book III-3: Difference between revisions

From The Logic Museum
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
*[[/Chapter 12|Chapter 12]] {{Translated not checked}}On the rules by which the consequences hold that are made from propositions of different modes
*[[/Chapter 12|Chapter 12]] {{Translated not checked}}On the rules by which the consequences hold that are made from propositions of different modes
*[[/Chapter 13|Chapter 13]] {{Translated not checked}}On the comparison of the modes for conversion.
*[[/Chapter 13|Chapter 13]] {{Translated not checked}}On the comparison of the modes for conversion.
*[[/Chapter 14|Chapter 14]]
*[[/Chapter 14|Chapter 14]] {{Translated not checked}}Concerning the equivalent propositions in which the 'necessary' mode is placed.
*[[/Chapter 15|Chapter 15]]
*[[/Chapter 15|Chapter 15]]
*[[/Chapter 16|Chapter 16]]
*[[/Chapter 16|Chapter 16]]

Revision as of 18:20, 18 February 2025


PART III-3: OF CONSEQUENCES

Colour codes

Chapter headings are colour coded to indicate the stage of the translation process. 'Reviewed' means that another competent translator has checked the work section by section. 'Authorised' means that a member of a specialist panel has reviewed the whole translation, and approved it.

Chapters 1-37: on Aristotle's Topics

  • Chapter 1 Of the mode of arguing by consequences, and arguments which do not have syllogistic form. And first, how many modes are there of so-called consequences?
  • Chapter 2 On the general rules by which consequences hold through an intrensic medium and conclude a universal.
  • Chapter 3 On the Rules by which the Universal Affirmative is inferred with respect to determined Predicates.
  • Chapter 4 Concerning the rules by which consequences inferring the universal negative hold.
  • Chapter 5 Concerning the rules which are not observed with respect to any predicates.
  • Chapter 6 On the rules that govern the consequences between particulars or indefinites.
  • Chapter 7 On the rules of inferring an affirmative from an affirmative through an external medium.
  • Chapter 8 Concerning the rules by which the consequences hold that infer the negative from the negative.
  • Chapter 9 On the rules governing consequences inferring a negative from a positive or the converse.
  • Chapter 10 On the rules governing consequences following from modal propositions; and first when both the antecedent and the consequence are in the same mode.
  • Chapter 11 Chapter 11. On the rules that govern consequences from one proposition of essence and another of a mode.
  • Chapter 12 On the rules by which the consequences hold that are made from propositions of different modes
  • Chapter 13 On the comparison of the modes for conversion.
  • Chapter 14 Concerning the equivalent propositions in which the 'necessary' mode is placed.
  • Chapter 15
  • Chapter 16
  • Chapter 17
  • Chapter 18
  • Chapter 19
  • Chapter 20
  • Chapter 21
  • Chapter 22
  • Chapter 23
  • Chapter 24
  • Chapter 25
  • Chapter 26
  • Chapter 27
  • Chapter 28
  • Chapter 29
  • Chapter 30

On induction

  • Chapter 31 On the species of argument called 'induction'
  • Chapter 32 How induction comes about in assertoric propositions
  • Chapter 33 On the induction of universal modal propositions
  • Chapter 34 How singular modal propositions in the sense of composition are related to universal modal propositions in the sense of composition
  • Chapter 35 On the induction of universal de possibili' propositions
  • Chapter 36 On the induction of universal de contintenti' propositions
  • Chapter 37 On the rules by which something can be proved to be equivocal

Chapters 38-45: Obligationes

Chapter 46: on the Liar paradox