Authors/Ockham/Summa Logicae/Book I/Chapter 62: Difference between revisions

From The Logic Museum
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
| Decimum praedicamentum ponitur habitus. Et de isto, sicut de prioribus, dico quod Aristoteles non posuit quod significet aliquam rem distinctam a rebus permanentibus, sed significat quod una res est circa aliam mobilis ad motum ipsius nisi contingat aliquod impedimentum, quae non est pars rei nec simul cum re sed loco et situ distincta a re.  
| Decimum praedicamentum ponitur habitus. Et de isto, sicut de prioribus, dico quod Aristoteles non posuit quod significet aliquam rem distinctam a rebus permanentibus, sed significat quod una res est circa aliam mobilis ad motum ipsius nisi contingat aliquod impedimentum, quae non est pars rei nec simul cum re sed loco et situ distincta a re.  
| The tenth category is given as state. And of this, just as of the ones before, I say that Aristotle did not suppose that it signifies some thing distinct from the permanent things, but rather that it signifies that one thing is moveable around another to a movement of that, unless '''contingat aliquod impedimentum''', which is not a part of the thing nor simulaneous with that thing, but distinct in place and situation from the thing.
| The tenth category is given as state. And of this, as of the former, I say that Aristotle did not hold that it signifies any thing distinct from permanent things, but means that one thing is around another moving to its motion, unless it encounters some hindrance, which is not a part of the thing, nor at the same time as the thing, but distinct from the thing in its place and situation.
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
| In quo praedicamento ponit talia 'armatum esse', 'calceatum esse' et sic de aliis. Tamen 'habere' secundum Philosophum multis modis dicitur, sicut in Praedicamentis exposui. Alii autem dicunt quod habitus est quidam respectus in ipso corpore circa aliud corpus vel in ipso corpore contento. Et de istis praedicamentis ista sufficiant.  
| In quo praedicamento ponit talia 'armatum esse', 'calceatum esse' et sic de aliis. Tamen 'habere' secundum Philosophum multis modis dicitur, sicut in Praedicamentis exposui. Alii autem dicunt quod habitus est quidam respectus in ipso corpore circa aliud corpus vel in ipso corpore contento. Et de istis praedicamentis ista sufficiant.  
| In this category he puts such things as ‘to be armed’, ‘to be shod’, and so on. Yet ‘to have’ is predicated in many ways, according to the Philosopher, just as I set out in the <i>Categories</i>. But others say that state is a certain relative in that body, concerning another body or contained in that body. And of these categories, these are sufficient.
| In this category he puts such things as ‘to be armed’, ‘to be shod’, and so on. Yet ‘to have’ is predicated in many ways, according to the Philosopher, just as I set out in the Categories. But others say that state is a certain relative in that body, concerning another body or contained in that body. And of these categories, these are sufficient.
|}
|}



Latest revision as of 22:42, 21 February 2025


Latin English
[CAP. 62. DE PRAEDICAMENTO HABITUS] [Chapter 62. On the category of having]
Decimum praedicamentum ponitur habitus. Et de isto, sicut de prioribus, dico quod Aristoteles non posuit quod significet aliquam rem distinctam a rebus permanentibus, sed significat quod una res est circa aliam mobilis ad motum ipsius nisi contingat aliquod impedimentum, quae non est pars rei nec simul cum re sed loco et situ distincta a re. The tenth category is given as state. And of this, as of the former, I say that Aristotle did not hold that it signifies any thing distinct from permanent things, but means that one thing is around another moving to its motion, unless it encounters some hindrance, which is not a part of the thing, nor at the same time as the thing, but distinct from the thing in its place and situation.
In quo praedicamento ponit talia 'armatum esse', 'calceatum esse' et sic de aliis. Tamen 'habere' secundum Philosophum multis modis dicitur, sicut in Praedicamentis exposui. Alii autem dicunt quod habitus est quidam respectus in ipso corpore circa aliud corpus vel in ipso corpore contento. Et de istis praedicamentis ista sufficiant. In this category he puts such things as ‘to be armed’, ‘to be shod’, and so on. Yet ‘to have’ is predicated in many ways, according to the Philosopher, just as I set out in the Categories. But others say that state is a certain relative in that body, concerning another body or contained in that body. And of these categories, these are sufficient.

Notes