Paris. B. Nat. lat. MS 13368

From The Logic Museum
Jump to navigationJump to search

Paris Bibliotheque Nationale Lat. 13368

  • S. Aug. regula et sermo (5).
  • Decreta (9).
  • S. Aug. de natura animae (21).

  • ff 128r-167v. Abelard:
    • 128r-144v Commentary on Perihermeneias (end is missing, Dal Pra 69-154, Cousin 593-597)
    • 146r-156r De Divisionibus (Dal Pra 155-204, Cousin 593-597)
    • 156r-162v Commentary on Isagoge (although the final quarter of the work is lost: Dal Pra 3-42; Cousin xii-xvii, 593-597. Geyer 592-4)
    • 164r-167v Peter Abelard, Commentary on Categories (beginning and end is missing, only a fifth of the text has survived, Dal Pra 43-68, Cousin pp. 593-597)
  • 168ra-168vb anonymous, de toto, incipit "Totum integrum aliud continuum, aliud disgregatum. Possumus autem dicere ..."[1]
  • 169rb-175va Goslenus of Soissons De Generibus et speciebus
  • 175va-177ra Goslenus of Soissons, De Modalibus, incipit "Modalium propositionum alie sunt cum adverbiali modo alie cum casuali "
  • 177rb Sophismata, incipit "'Socrates est albus'. Hec est quedam propositio vera. Ad hanc sequuuntur due vere, quia, si Socrates est albus, Socrates est et albedo qua afficitur albus; aliter non posset Socrates esse albus".
  • 177vb-179rb Commentary on Isagoge
  • 179va-vb anonymous, De Sermonibus primae et secundae intentionis, incipit "Sermones alii prime impositionis, alii secunde "
  • 180ra-183vb Anonymous Commentary on Perihermeneias (Cousin, Ouvrages inédits, pp. 595-601 - incomplete, lacuna at 183va. Wrongly attributed to Abelard by Cousin)
  • 184r is blank
  • 185ra-191ra anonymous, Commentary on Categories, incipit 'Quotiens solet opponi.' Expeditis omnibus ...
  • 191rb-194va anonymous, Commentary on De Divisionibus
  • 194va-b anonymous, Logical notes
  • 195ra-214vb Adelard of Bath (?), Commentary on Categories, incipit "Intentio Aristotilis in hoc opere est de primis vocibus ... disputare in eo quod res significant. In eo quod res significant ideo determinatur (?) quia voces dupliciter accipiuntur ..."[2].
  • 215ra-223vb Rabanus (?), Commentary on Isagoge, incipit "Intentio Porphirii est in hoc opere facilem intellectum ad Predicamenta preparare, tradendo (sic? should be 'tractando') de quinque rebus vel vocibus genere scilicet, specie, differentia, proprio et accidenti, quarum cognitio utilis est ad predicamentorum cognitionem. Licet Porphirius in hoc tractatu de rebus innumerabilibus agat, de omnibus scilicet rebus generalibus, et omnibus speciebus et differentiis, propriis et accidentibus, de quinque tamen agere dicitur ..."
  • 224ra-225ra, Adelard of Bath (?), Commentary on De Topicis differentiis
  • 225rb-229v, Adelard of Bath (?), author ms Rabanus , Commentary on Perihermeneias, incipit "Intentio Aristotilis est in hoc opere de simplici enuntiativa interpretatione et de eius elementis, nomine scilicet atque verbo gratia ipsius simplicis enuntiatione (should be: enuntiative) interpretationis pertractare ..."[3]

See also

Notes

  1. According to Risse, this text continues up to f. 175, is to be attributed to Abelard and should probably be identified as De generibus et speciebus. He refers to Orléans 266, ff. 153-166 (XII)
  2. According to Peter King, ff.195ra-218v is an anonymous gloss on the Categories, a "Pastiche of Logica Ingredientibus 2"
  3. Jos. Reiners, Der aristotelische Realismus (Aachen 1917), p. 17, cf. Arsenal 910, 122-133 (Arsenal 910 once contained a commentary on Terence)