User talk:Ragnarr49: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
If you look at [[Authors/Ockham/Summa_Logicae/Book_I/Chapter_2]] you can see the tick box in action. [[Authors/Ockham/Summa_Logicae/Book_I]] shows the colour coding for templates. However there is no code for copyediting work, which is what (I think) you are doing. Any thoughts welcome. [[User:Edward Ockham|Edward Ockham]] 05:41, 29 November 2018 (CST) | If you look at [[Authors/Ockham/Summa_Logicae/Book_I/Chapter_2]] you can see the tick box in action. [[Authors/Ockham/Summa_Logicae/Book_I]] shows the colour coding for templates. However there is no code for copyediting work, which is what (I think) you are doing. Any thoughts welcome. [[User:Edward Ockham|Edward Ockham]] 05:41, 29 November 2018 (CST) | ||
I agree that my efforts are copyediting or proofreading. I do not feel they are a blessing of the translation by a competent authority. Thank you. | |||
Revision as of 20:21, 29 November 2018
Welcome
Thanks for these corrections - some pretty gross errors there!
We ought to discuss the review methodology some time. Edward Ockham 05:37, 29 November 2018 (CST)
If you look at Authors/Ockham/Summa_Logicae/Book_I/Chapter_2 you can see the tick box in action. Authors/Ockham/Summa_Logicae/Book_I shows the colour coding for templates. However there is no code for copyediting work, which is what (I think) you are doing. Any thoughts welcome. Edward Ockham 05:41, 29 November 2018 (CST)
I agree that my efforts are copyediting or proofreading. I do not feel they are a blessing of the translation by a competent authority. Thank you.