User talk:Ragnarr49: Difference between revisions
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I agree that my efforts are copyediting or proofreading. I do not feel they are a blessing of the translation by a competent authority. I do not think that they warrant color coding. Thank you. | I agree that my efforts are copyediting or proofreading. I do not feel they are a blessing of the translation by a competent authority. I do not think that they warrant color coding. Thank you. | ||
I have just translated the missing and untranslated portions of Summa Logicae, Book 1, Ch 49-53. You may want to check it and update the status as you see fit. Ch 52 and 53 are currently labeled as Untranslated. Thanks and best wishes. | |||
Revision as of 20:13, 23 June 2019
Welcome
Thanks for these corrections - some pretty gross errors there!
We ought to discuss the review methodology some time. Edward Ockham 05:37, 29 November 2018 (CST)
If you look at Authors/Ockham/Summa_Logicae/Book_I/Chapter_2 you can see the tick box in action. Authors/Ockham/Summa_Logicae/Book_I shows the colour coding for templates. However there is no code for copyediting work, which is what (I think) you are doing. Any thoughts welcome. Edward Ockham 05:41, 29 November 2018 (CST)
I agree that my efforts are copyediting or proofreading. I do not feel they are a blessing of the translation by a competent authority. I do not think that they warrant color coding. Thank you.
I have just translated the missing and untranslated portions of Summa Logicae, Book 1, Ch 49-53. You may want to check it and update the status as you see fit. Ch 52 and 53 are currently labeled as Untranslated. Thanks and best wishes.