Authors/Ockham/Summa Logicae/Book III-1/Chapter 57: Difference between revisions
< Authors | Ockham | Summa Logicae | Book III-1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
||Cap. 57. De mixtione possibilis et impossibilis in omni figura | ||Cap. 57. De mixtione possibilis et impossibilis in omni figura | ||
|| | ||Chapter 57. On the mixture of possible and impossible in every figure. | ||
|- valign = top | |- valign = top | ||
||Sequitur videre de mixtione possibilis et impossibilis. Sed de ea potest patere ex illis quae dicta sunt circa mixtionem necessarii et possibles<ref>Supra, cap. 44-46.</ref>, pro eo quod semper illa de impossibili aequivalet alicui de necessario, et ideo de ea non plus ad praesens. | ||Sequitur videre de mixtione possibilis et impossibilis. Sed de ea potest patere ex illis quae dicta sunt circa mixtionem necessarii et possibles<ref>Supra, cap. 44-46.</ref>, pro eo quod semper illa de impossibili aequivalet alicui de necessario, et ideo de ea non plus ad praesens. | ||
|| | ||It follows to see about the mixture of possible and impossible. But it can be clear about it from what was said about the mixture of necessary and possible<ref>Supra, chap. 44-46.</ref>, because that de impossibili is always equivalent to something de necessario, and therefore no more about it for the present. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:45, 20 April 2025
| Latin | English |
|---|---|
| Cap. 57. De mixtione possibilis et impossibilis in omni figura | Chapter 57. On the mixture of possible and impossible in every figure. |
| Sequitur videre de mixtione possibilis et impossibilis. Sed de ea potest patere ex illis quae dicta sunt circa mixtionem necessarii et possibles[1], pro eo quod semper illa de impossibili aequivalet alicui de necessario, et ideo de ea non plus ad praesens. | It follows to see about the mixture of possible and impossible. But it can be clear about it from what was said about the mixture of necessary and possible[2], because that de impossibili is always equivalent to something de necessario, and therefore no more about it for the present. |