Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Undo revision 12917 by Edward Ockham (talk)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Authors]] | |||
They were discovered by Cousin (see [[Cousin 1836]] p.x-xviii), in [[Paris. B. Nat. lat. 13368|NL 13368]], 128r-168r. Cameron (2010) has argued that the supposed cross-reference in the Dialectica is not to this work. It is not completely certain whether they form a set, or are even by Abelard<ref>M. Cameron, Abelard’s So-called Early Glosses: Some Questions, in Arts du langage et theologie aux confins des XIe-XIIe siecles, ed. I. Rosier-Catach (Brepols Publishers, 2010), pp. 655-672.</ref>. | They were discovered by Cousin (see [[Cousin 1836]] p.x-xviii), in [[Paris. B. Nat. lat. 13368|NL 13368]], 128r-168r. Cameron (2010) has argued that the supposed cross-reference in the Dialectica is not to this work. It is not completely certain whether they form a set, or are even by Abelard<ref>M. Cameron, Abelard’s So-called Early Glosses: Some Questions, in Arts du langage et theologie aux confins des XIe-XIIe siecles, ed. I. Rosier-Catach (Brepols Publishers, 2010), pp. 655-672.</ref>. | ||
Revision as of 04:19, 12 April 2015
They were discovered by Cousin (see Cousin 1836 p.x-xviii), in NL 13368, 128r-168r. Cameron (2010) has argued that the supposed cross-reference in the Dialectica is not to this work. It is not completely certain whether they form a set, or are even by Abelard[1].
test
- Authors Dal Pra 3-42
Notes
- ↑ M. Cameron, Abelard’s So-called Early Glosses: Some Questions, in Arts du langage et theologie aux confins des XIe-XIIe siecles, ed. I. Rosier-Catach (Brepols Publishers, 2010), pp. 655-672.