Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From The Logic Museum
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==English commentaries==
[[File:Caput nonum A.jpg|thumb|right|600px|Zabarella Opera Logica]]
Adapted from "English Commentaries [on the ''Metaphysics''] before Scotus", Sylvia Donati, in [[Amerini & Galluzzo 2013]].<ref>testing</ref>


 
Caput nonum quod genus Logicae non sit facultas
=== Co. 1240-50===
ALIQUI fuere, qui ea, quae modo diximus, considerantes, logicaixt neque scientia m, nequeartem, sed facultateixt vocandam esse existimarunt, ex Aristotelehanc appellationem fumentes, qui in principio primiiibridcarteRhetoricadicit Diale#icam, & Rhetoricam similirs esse inter se, & utranque ftwafjur quandam cfTe; ftatucrc igi tur videtur Aristoteles facultategenuslogicj proximum, quod cttam Rhetoricam completfatur. Scd hi, si id, quod dicunt, intelHgercnt, utderent utique fead propositam de genere lo gicf quaestionem vel falfam responsionem adducere, vel nullam, proinde integram adhuc manere difficultatem • Videndum est quid nominefacultatisintelligant, sumitur enim quandoque facultas italate, ut omnes disciplinas docentes compleflatur, &adtivas, &contemplativas, & effectrices, & alias omnes, si qu, sunt, ut ab Aristoteleacceptum fuit inprimocapiteprimi libri demoribus; nam omnes disciplin? ea ratione facultates dici possunt, quatenus earum cognitio animum potentem reddunt, idest aptum ad aliquid contemplandum, vel agendum, vel efficiendum, vc scientia naturalis dicitur naturalis facultas, quatenus i&mi ea est prjdttus, facultatem adeptus est contemplandi res naturales; hoc modo si facultatem fumant, non dicunt genus logicar, nifiamplissimum, & remotissimum, quasidicantlogicam esse quan
*Richard Rufus ''Scriptum super Metaphysicam'' (an extensive commentary on books II, I, III-X and XII, based on the ''Metaphysica Nova''.
*Adam of Buckfield, ''Commentary on the Metaphysics'', Books II, I, III—X, XII MS  [[Oxford. Balliol. 241|Oxford, Balliol College, 241]]. fols. 2ra-79vb
 
===Co. 1255-65===
*Anonymous (= Geoffrey of Aspall), ''Questions on the Metaphysics'', Books II, I, III-X MS Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College, 509, fols. 52ra-123rb
*Anonymous, ''Questions on the Metaphysics'', Books III—VII, MS London, Wellcome Historical Medical Library, 333, fols. 111ra-121va, 124rb-150rb
 
===Around 1270===
*[[Authors/R de Clive|Richard of Clive]], Questions on the Metaphysics, Books I-V, VII-VIII, [[Worcester 13|MSS  Worcester]], Cathedral Library, Q. 13, fols. 116ra-155rb, Cambridge, Peterhouse 152, fols. 322ra-351rb
 
===Around 1280===
*John Dinsdale, ''Questions on the Metaphysics'', Books I-X, XII, MS  Durham, Cathedral Library, C. IV. 20, fols. 1ra-196va
===1292===
*William of Bonkes, ''Questions on the Metaphysics'' Books III—V, VII-X, XII, MS Cambridge, [[Caius 344/540|Gonville and Caius College, 344]], fols. 28ra-91vb
 
===End of the 13th century===
*Anonymous, ''Questions on the Metaphysics'', Books I—IV, MS  Cambridge, Peterhouse, 192, III, fols. 1ra-24vb
*Anonymous, ''Questions on the Metaphysics'', Books l-V, VII, XII MS  Cambridge, Peterhouse, 192, IV, fols. 1ra-53r
*Anonymous, ''Questions on the Metaphysics'', Books I—VII, MS  Oxford, Oriel College, 33, fols. 199ra-261ra
*Anonymous, ''Questions on the Metaphysics'', Book MI, MS  Oxford, Oriel College. 33, fols. 262ra-268ra
*Anonymous, ''Questions on the Metaphysics'', Books I—IV, MS  Assisi, Biblioteca Comunale, 290, fols. 64ra-85rb
 
{{reflist}}
 
==See also==
**[[]]
 
 
 
[[Category:Aristotle]]
[[Category:Metaphysics]]

Latest revision as of 02:42, 6 October 2020

Zabarella Opera Logica

Caput nonum quod genus Logicae non sit facultas ALIQUI fuere, qui ea, quae modo diximus, considerantes, logicaixt neque scientia m, nequeartem, sed facultateixt vocandam esse existimarunt, ex Aristotelehanc appellationem fumentes, qui in principio primiiibridcarteRhetoricadicit Diale#icam, & Rhetoricam similirs esse inter se, & utranque ftwafjur quandam cfTe; ftatucrc igi tur videtur Aristoteles facultategenuslogicj proximum, quod cttam Rhetoricam completfatur. Scd hi, si id, quod dicunt, intelHgercnt, utderent utique fead propositam de genere lo gicf quaestionem vel falfam responsionem adducere, vel nullam, proinde integram adhuc manere difficultatem • Videndum est quid nominefacultatisintelligant, sumitur enim quandoque facultas italate, ut omnes disciplinas docentes compleflatur, &adtivas, &contemplativas, & effectrices, & alias omnes, si qu, sunt, ut ab Aristoteleacceptum fuit inprimocapiteprimi libri demoribus; nam omnes disciplin? ea ratione facultates dici possunt, quatenus earum cognitio animum potentem reddunt, idest aptum ad aliquid contemplandum, vel agendum, vel efficiendum, vc scientia naturalis dicitur naturalis facultas, quatenus i&mi ea est prjdttus, facultatem adeptus est contemplandi res naturales; hoc modo si facultatem fumant, non dicunt genus logicar, nifiamplissimum, & remotissimum, quasidicantlogicam esse quan