Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Undo revision 12917 by Edward Ockham (talk)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Introductiones parvulorum''', or introductions for beginners in the study of logic. A series of brief glosses which were supposedly written early in Abelard's career, perhaps between 1102/5 and 1112/14 and which may be identical with those he called "Introductiones parvulorum" in the ''Dialectica'' <ref> Abelard 1970 174:1, 232:10-12, 269:1, 329:4, cf. Mews 1985 74-5.</ref>. | '''Introductiones parvulorum''', or introductions for beginners in the study of logic. A series of brief glosses which were supposedly written early in Abelard's career, perhaps between 1102/5 and 1112/14 and which may be identical with those he called "Introductiones parvulorum" in the ''Dialectica'' <ref> Abelard 1970 174:1, 232:10-12, 269:1, 329:4, cf. Mews 1985 74-5.</ref>. | ||
[[ | They were discovered by Cousin (see [[Cousin 1836]] p.x-xviii), in [[Paris. B. Nat. lat. 13368|NL 13368]], 128r-168r. Cameron (2010) has argued that the supposed cross-reference in the Dialectica is not to this work. It is not completely certain whether they form a set, or are even by Abelard<ref>M. Cameron, Abelard’s So-called Early Glosses: Some Questions, in Arts du langage et theologie aux confins des XIe-XIIe siecles, ed. I. Rosier-Catach (Brepols Publishers, 2010), pp. 655-672.</ref>. | ||
==test== | ==test== | ||
[[Authors]] | *[[Authors]] Dal Pra 3-42 | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 04:18, 12 April 2015
Introductiones parvulorum, or introductions for beginners in the study of logic. A series of brief glosses which were supposedly written early in Abelard's career, perhaps between 1102/5 and 1112/14 and which may be identical with those he called "Introductiones parvulorum" in the Dialectica [1].
They were discovered by Cousin (see Cousin 1836 p.x-xviii), in NL 13368, 128r-168r. Cameron (2010) has argued that the supposed cross-reference in the Dialectica is not to this work. It is not completely certain whether they form a set, or are even by Abelard[2].
test
- Authors Dal Pra 3-42