Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
They were discovered by Cousin (see [[Cousin 1836]] p.x-xviii), in [[Paris. B. Nat. lat. 13368|NL 13368]], 128r-168r. Cameron (2010) has argued that the supposed cross-reference in the Dialectica is not to this work. It is not completely certain whether they form a set, or are even by Abelard<ref>M. Cameron, Abelard’s So-called Early Glosses: Some Questions, in Arts du langage et theologie aux confins des XIe-XIIe siecles, ed. I. Rosier-Catach (Brepols Publishers, 2010), pp. 655-672.</ref>. | They were discovered by Cousin (see [[Cousin 1836]] p.x-xviii), in [[Paris. B. Nat. lat. 13368|NL 13368]], 128r-168r. Cameron (2010) has argued that the supposed cross-reference in the Dialectica is not to this work. It is not completely certain whether they form a set, or are even by Abelard<ref>M. Cameron, Abelard’s So-called Early Glosses: Some Questions, in Arts du langage et theologie aux confins des XIe-XIIe siecles, ed. I. Rosier-Catach (Brepols Publishers, 2010), pp. 655-672.</ref>. | ||
*[[Authors]] Dal Pra 3-42 | *[[Authors]] Dal Pra 3-42 | ||
Revision as of 04:17, 12 April 2015
Introductiones parvulorum, or introductions for beginners in the study of logic. A series of brief glosses which were supposedly written early in Abelard's career, perhaps between 1102/5 and 1112/14 and which may be identical with those he called "Introductiones parvulorum" in the Dialectica [1].
They were discovered by Cousin (see Cousin 1836 p.x-xviii), in NL 13368, 128r-168r. Cameron (2010) has argued that the supposed cross-reference in the Dialectica is not to this work. It is not completely certain whether they form a set, or are even by Abelard[2].
- Authors Dal Pra 3-42