Authors/Aristotle/metaphysics/l4/c1 - Revision history

Edward Ockham: /* Chapter 1 */

2015-02-21T22:26:12Z

Chapter 1

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 21 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Chapter 1==		==Chapter 1==
	{\| border=1 cellpadding=10		{\| border=1 cellpadding=10
	!valign = top width=45%\|Latin		!valign = top width=30%\|Greek
	!valign = top width=55%\|English		!valign = top width=30%\|Latin
			!valign = top width=40%\|English
	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|

	\|METHAPHISICE ARISTOTILIS LIBER QUARTUS		\|METHAPHISICE ARISTOTILIS LIBER QUARTUS

Line 9:		Line 12:

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|[1003α] [21] ἔστιν ἐπιστήμη τις ἣ θεωρεῖ τὸ ὂν ᾗ ὂν καὶ τὰ τούτῳ ὑπάρχοντα καθ᾽ αὑτό.

	\|{{p\|67}} <span id=c1></span> Est scientia quaedam quae speculatur ens in quantum est {{a\|bk1003a21\|↵}} ens et quae huic insunt secundum se.		\|{{p\|67}} <span id=c1></span> Est scientia quaedam quae speculatur ens in quantum est {{a\|bk1003a21\|↵}} ens et quae huic insunt secundum se.

Line 14:		Line 19:

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|αὕτη δ᾽ ἐστὶν οὐδεμιᾷ τῶν ἐν μέρει λεγομένων ἡ αὐτή: οὐδεμία γὰρ τῶν ἄλλων ἐπισκοπεῖ καθόλου περὶ τοῦ ὄντος ᾗ ὄν, ἀλλὰ μέρος αὐτοῦ τι ἀποτεμόμεναι [25] περὶ τούτου θεωροῦσι τὸ συμβεβηκός, οἷον αἱ μαθηματικαὶ τῶν ἐπιστημῶν.

	\|Haec autem nulli * in parte dictarum eadem; aliarum enim nulla intendit universaliter de ente in quantum est ens. Verum partem eius abscindentes aliquam circa * hanc speculantur * accidens, velut scientiarum {{a\|bk1003a25\|↵}} mathematice.		\|Haec autem nulli * in parte dictarum eadem; aliarum enim nulla intendit universaliter de ente in quantum est ens. Verum partem eius abscindentes aliquam circa * hanc speculantur * accidens, velut scientiarum {{a\|bk1003a25\|↵}} mathematice.

Line 19:		Line 26:

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|ἐπεὶ δὲ τὰς ἀρχὰς καὶ τὰς ἀκροτάτας αἰτίας ζητοῦμεν, δῆλον ὡς φύσεώς τινος αὐτὰς ἀναγκαῖον εἶναι καθ᾽ αὑτήν. εἰ οὖν καὶ οἱ τὰ στοιχεῖα τῶν ὄντων ζητοῦντες ταύτας τὰς ἀρχὰς ἐζήτουν, ἀνάγκη καὶ τὰ [30] στοιχεῖα τοῦ ὄντος εἶναι μὴ κατὰ συμβεβηκὸς ἀλλ᾽ ᾗ ὄν: διὸ καὶ ἡμῖν τοῦ ὄντος ᾗ ὂν τὰς πρώτας αἰτίας ληπτέον.

	\|Quoniam autem principia et extremas quaerimus causas, palam quia naturae cuiusdam ipsas secundum se esse est necesse. Si ergo et entium elementa quaerentes haec quesierunt principia, necesse et entis elementa esse non secundum accidens {{a\|bk1003a30\|↵}} sed in quantum * entia. Unde et nobis entis in quantum est ens prime cause sunt accipiende.		\|Quoniam autem principia et extremas quaerimus causas, palam quia naturae cuiusdam ipsas secundum se esse est necesse. Si ergo et entium elementa quaerentes haec quesierunt principia, necesse et entis elementa esse non secundum accidens {{a\|bk1003a30\|↵}} sed in quantum * entia. Unde et nobis entis in quantum est ens prime cause sunt accipiende.

Line 24:		Line 33:

	\|}		\|}

	<noinclude>		<noinclude>
	==Notes==		==Notes==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}</noinclude>
	</noinclude>

Edward Ockham: Text replace - "{{bk\|(.*)}}" to "{{a|bk$1|↵}}"

2014-03-13T11:26:48Z

Text replace - "{{bk\|(.*)}}" to "{{a|bk$1|↵}}"

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:26, 13 March 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
	\|{{p\|67}} <span id=c1></span> Est scientia quaedam quae speculatur ens in quantum est {{bk\|~~1003a21~~}} ens et quae huic insunt secundum se.		\|{{p\|67}} <span id=c1></span> Est scientia quaedam quae speculatur ens in quantum est {{a\|bk1003a21\|↵}} ens et quae huic insunt secundum se.

	\|'''Chapter 1'''. <span id=jp294></span> THERE is a science which investigates being as being and the attributes which belong to this in virtue of its own nature.		\|'''Chapter 1'''. <span id=jp294></span> THERE is a science which investigates being as being and the attributes which belong to this in virtue of its own nature.

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
	\|Haec autem nulli * in parte dictarum eadem; aliarum enim nulla intendit universaliter de ente in quantum est ens. Verum partem eius abscindentes aliquam circa * hanc speculantur * accidens, velut scientiarum {{bk\|~~1003a25~~}} mathematice.		\|Haec autem nulli * in parte dictarum eadem; aliarum enim nulla intendit universaliter de ente in quantum est ens. Verum partem eius abscindentes aliquam circa * hanc speculantur * accidens, velut scientiarum {{a\|bk1003a25\|↵}} mathematice.

	\|<span id=jp295></span> Now this is not the same as any of the so-called special sciences; for none of these others treats universally of being as being. They cut off a part of being and investigate the attribute of this part; this is what the mathematical sciences for instance do.		\|<span id=jp295></span> Now this is not the same as any of the so-called special sciences; for none of these others treats universally of being as being. They cut off a part of being and investigate the attribute of this part; this is what the mathematical sciences for instance do.

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
	\|Quoniam autem principia et extremas quaerimus causas, palam quia naturae cuiusdam ipsas secundum se esse est necesse. Si ergo et entium elementa quaerentes haec quesierunt principia, necesse et entis elementa esse non secundum accidens {{bk\|~~1003a30~~}} sed in quantum * entia. Unde et nobis entis in quantum est ens prime cause sunt accipiende.		\|Quoniam autem principia et extremas quaerimus causas, palam quia naturae cuiusdam ipsas secundum se esse est necesse. Si ergo et entium elementa quaerentes haec quesierunt principia, necesse et entis elementa esse non secundum accidens {{a\|bk1003a30\|↵}} sed in quantum * entia. Unde et nobis entis in quantum est ens prime cause sunt accipiende.

	\|<span id=jp296></span> Now since we are seeking the first principles and the highest causes, clearly there must be some thing to which these belong in virtue of its own nature. If then those who sought the elements of existing things were seeking these same principles, it is necessary that the elements must be elements of being not by accident but just because it is being. Therefore it is of being as being that we also must grasp the first causes.		\|<span id=jp296></span> Now since we are seeking the first principles and the highest causes, clearly there must be some thing to which these belong in virtue of its own nature. If then those who sought the elements of existing things were seeking these same principles, it is necessary that the elements must be elements of being not by accident but just because it is being. Therefore it is of being as being that we also must grasp the first causes.

Edward Ockham: Created page with "==Chapter 1== {| border=1 cellpadding=10 !valign = top width=45%|Latin !valign = top width=55%|English |- valign = top |METHAPHISICE ARISTOTILIS LIBER QUARTUS |Aristotle ''Metap..."

2014-03-09T15:36:54Z

Created page with "==Chapter 1== {| border=1 cellpadding=10 !valign = top width=45%|Latin !valign = top width=55%|English |- valign = top |METHAPHISICE ARISTOTILIS LIBER QUARTUS |Aristotle ''Metap..."

New page

==Chapter 1==
{| border=1 cellpadding=10
!valign = top width=45%|Latin
!valign = top width=55%|English
|- valign = top
|METHAPHISICE ARISTOTILIS LIBER QUARTUS

|Aristotle ''Metaphysics'' Book 4 (G)

|- valign = top
|{{p|67}} Est scientia quaedam quae speculatur ens in quantum est {{bk|1003a21}} ens et quae huic insunt secundum se.

|'''Chapter 1'''. THERE is a science which investigates being as being and the attributes which belong to this in virtue of its own nature.

|- valign = top
|Haec autem nulli * in parte dictarum eadem; aliarum enim nulla intendit universaliter de ente in quantum est ens. Verum partem eius abscindentes aliquam circa * hanc speculantur * accidens, velut scientiarum {{bk|1003a25}} mathematice.

| Now this is not the same as any of the so-called special sciences; for none of these others treats universally of being as being. They cut off a part of being and investigate the attribute of this part; this is what the mathematical sciences for instance do.

|- valign = top
|Quoniam autem principia et extremas quaerimus causas, palam quia naturae cuiusdam ipsas secundum se esse est necesse. Si ergo et entium elementa quaerentes haec quesierunt principia, necesse et entis elementa esse non secundum accidens {{bk|1003a30}} sed in quantum * entia. Unde et nobis entis in quantum est ens prime cause sunt accipiende.

| Now since we are seeking the first principles and the highest causes, clearly there must be some thing to which these belong in virtue of its own nature. If then those who sought the elements of existing things were seeking these same principles, it is necessary that the elements must be elements of being not by accident but just because it is being. Therefore it is of being as being that we also must grasp the first causes.

|}

<noinclude>
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
</noinclude>