Authors/Aristotle/metaphysics/l12/c1 - Revision history

Edward Ockham: /* Chapter 1 */

2015-02-21T23:10:41Z

Chapter 1

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:10, 21 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Chapter 1==		==Chapter 1==
	{\| border=1 cellpadding=10		{\| border=1 cellpadding=10
	!valign = top width=45%\|Latin		!valign = top width=30%\|Greek
	!valign = top width=55%\|English		!valign = top width=30%\|Latin
			!valign = top width=40%\|English
	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|

	\|METHAPHISICE ARISTOTILIS LIBER DUODECIMUS		\|METHAPHISICE ARISTOTILIS LIBER DUODECIMUS

Line 9:		Line 12:

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|[1069α] [18] περὶ τῆς οὐσίας ἡ θεωρία: τῶν γὰρ οὐσιῶν αἱ ἀρχαὶ καὶ τὰ αἴτια ζητοῦνται.

	\|{{p\|246}} <span id=c1></span>De substantia quidem theoria est; nam substantiarum principia et cause quaeruntur.		\|{{p\|246}} <span id=c1></span>De substantia quidem theoria est; nam substantiarum principia et cause quaeruntur.

Line 14:		Line 19:

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|καὶ γὰρ εἰ ὡς ὅλον τι τὸ πᾶν, [20] ἡ οὐσία πρῶτον μέρος: καὶ εἰ τῷ ἐφεξῆς, κἂν οὕτως πρῶτον ἡ οὐσία, εἶτα τὸ ποιόν, εἶτα τὸ ποσόν.

	\|''Et enim si ut totum quoddam'' {{ln\|bk1069a20}} omne, substantia est prima pars; et si eo quod consequenter, et ita primum substantia, deinde qualitas aut quantitas.		\|''Et enim si ut totum quoddam'' {{ln\|bk1069a20}} omne, substantia est prima pars; et si eo quod consequenter, et ita primum substantia, deinde qualitas aut quantitas.

Line 19:		Line 26:

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|ἅμα δὲ οὐδ᾽ ὄντα ὡς εἰπεῖν ἁπλῶς ταῦτα, ἀλλὰ ποιότητες καὶ κινήσεις, ἢ καὶ τὸ οὐ λευκὸν καὶ τὸ οὐκ εὐθύ: λέγομεν γοῦν εἶναι καὶ ταῦτα, οἷον ἔστιν οὐ λευκόν.

	\|Simul [/''Similiter''] ''autem'' nec entia ut est simpliciter dicere haec, sed qualitates et motus, qua et non album et non rectum; dicimus enim esse et haec, ut puta est non album.		\|Simul [/''Similiter''] ''autem'' nec entia ut est simpliciter dicere haec, sed qualitates et motus, qua et non album et non rectum; dicimus enim esse et haec, ut puta est non album.

Line 24:		Line 33:

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|ἔτι οὐδὲν τῶν ἄλλων χωριστόν.

	\|''Amplius nihil'' aliorum separa{{ln\|bk1069a25}}bile.		\|''Amplius nihil'' aliorum separa{{ln\|bk1069a25}}bile.

Line 29:		Line 40:

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|[25] μαρτυροῦσι δὲ καὶ οἱ ἀρχαῖοι ἔργῳ: τῆς γὰρ οὐσίας ἐζήτουν ἀρχὰς καὶ στοιχεῖα καὶ αἴτια. οἱ μὲν οὖν νῦν τὰ καθόλου οὐσίας μᾶλλον τιθέασιν (τὰ γὰρ γένη καθόλου, ἅ φασιν ἀρχὰς καὶ οὐσίας εἶναι μᾶλλον διὰ τὸ λογικῶς ζητεῖν): οἱ δὲ πάλαι τὰ καθ᾽ ἕκαστα, οἷον πῦρ καὶ γῆν, ἀλλ᾽ οὐ τὸ [30] κοινόν, σῶμα.

	\|''Testantur autem'' et antiqui opere; nam substantiae quaerebant principia et elementa et causas. * qui quidem nunc universalia substantias magis ponunt; nam genera universalia, quae dicunt principia et substantias esse magis propter logice inquirere. Qui vero antiquitus particularia, ut ignem et {{ln\|bk1069a30}} terram, sed non commune, corpus.		\|''Testantur autem'' et antiqui opere; nam substantiae quaerebant principia et elementa et causas. * qui quidem nunc universalia substantias magis ponunt; nam genera universalia, quae dicunt principia et substantias esse magis propter logice inquirere. Qui vero antiquitus particularia, ut ignem et {{ln\|bk1069a30}} terram, sed non commune, corpus.

Line 34:		Line 47:

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|οὐσίαι δὲ τρεῖς, μία μὲν αἰσθητή—ἧς ἡ μὲν ἀΐδιος ἡ δὲ φθαρτή, ἣν πάντες ὁμολογοῦσιν, οἷον τὰ φυτὰ καὶ τὰ ζῷα [ἡ δ᾽ ἀΐδιος]—ἧς ἀνάγκη τὰ στοιχεῖα λαβεῖν, εἴτε ἓν εἴτε πολλά: ἄλλη δὲ ἀκίνητος, καὶ ταύτην φασί τινες εἶναι χωριστήν, οἱ μὲν εἰς δύο διαιροῦντες, [35] οἱ δὲ εἰς μίαν φύσιν τιθέντες τὰ εἴδη καὶ τὰ μαθηματικά, οἱ δὲ τὰ μαθηματικὰ μόνον τούτων. ἐκεῖναι μὲν δὴ φυσικῆς (μετὰ κινήσεως γάρ), [1069β] [1] αὕτη δὲ ἑτέρας, εἰ μηδεμία αὐτοῖς ἀρχὴ κοινή.

	\|Substantiae vero tres sunt, una quidem sensibilis, cuius alia quidem sempiterna alia corruptibilis, quam omnes * confitentur, ut plante et animalia. * Sempiterna autem, cuius elementa necesse est accipere, sive unum sive multa. Alia vero immo{{p\|247}}bilis. Hanc dicunt quidam separabilem esse, hii quidem in duo dividentes, alii in unam naturam species ponentes et mathema{{ln\|bk1069a35}}tica, alii horum mathematica solum. Ille quidem naturalis (* cum motu enim), et haec alterius, si nullum ipsis princi{{ln\|bk1069b1}}pium commune est.		\|Substantiae vero tres sunt, una quidem sensibilis, cuius alia quidem sempiterna alia corruptibilis, quam omnes * confitentur, ut plante et animalia. * Sempiterna autem, cuius elementa necesse est accipere, sive unum sive multa. Alia vero immo{{p\|247}}bilis. Hanc dicunt quidam separabilem esse, hii quidem in duo dividentes, alii in unam naturam species ponentes et mathema{{ln\|bk1069a35}}tica, alii horum mathematica solum. Ille quidem naturalis (* cum motu enim), et haec alterius, si nullum ipsis princi{{ln\|bk1069b1}}pium commune est.

Line 39:		Line 54:

	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top
			\|ἡ δ᾽ αἰσθητὴ οὐσία μεταβλητή. εἰ δ᾽ ἡ μεταβολὴ ἐκ τῶν ἀντικειμένων ἢ τῶν μεταξύ, ἀντικειμένων δὲ μὴ [5] πάντων (οὐ λευκὸν γὰρ ἡ φωνή) ἀλλ᾽ ἐκ τοῦ ἐναντίου, ἀνάγκη ὑπεῖναί τι τὸ μεταβάλλον εἰς τὴν ἐναντίωσιν: οὐ γὰρ τὰ ἐναντία μεταβάλλει.

	\|''Sensibilis vero substantia mutabilis''. Si autem mutatio est ex oppositis aut mediis, oppositis autem non omnibus (non {{ln\|bk1069b5}} album enim * vox), sed ex contrario, necesse subesse quid mutabile in contrarietatem; non enim contraria transmutantur.		\|''Sensibilis vero substantia mutabilis''. Si autem mutatio est ex oppositis aut mediis, oppositis autem non omnibus (non {{ln\|bk1069b5}} album enim * vox), sed ex contrario, necesse subesse quid mutabile in contrarietatem; non enim contraria transmutantur.

	\|<span id=jp1029></span>Sensible substance is changeable. Now if change proceeds from opposites or from intermediates, and not from all opposites (for the voice is not-white, (but it does not therefore change to white)), but from the contrary, there must be something underlying which changes into the contrary state; for the contraries do not change.		\|<span id=jp1029></span>Sensible substance is changeable. Now if change proceeds from opposites or from intermediates, and not from all opposites (for the voice is not-white, (but it does not therefore change to white)), but from the contrary, there must be something underlying which changes into the contrary state; for the contraries do not change.

	\|}<noinclude>		\|}
			<noinclude>
	==Notes==		==Notes==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}</noinclude>
	</noinclude>

Edward Ockham: Created page with "==Chapter 1== {| border=1 cellpadding=10 !valign = top width=45%|Latin !valign = top width=55%|English |- valign = top |METHAPHISICE ARISTOTILIS LIBER DUODECIMUS |Aristotle ''Me..."

2014-03-13T21:13:59Z

Created page with "==Chapter 1== {| border=1 cellpadding=10 !valign = top width=45%|Latin !valign = top width=55%|English |- valign = top |METHAPHISICE ARISTOTILIS LIBER DUODECIMUS |Aristotle ''Me..."

New page

==Chapter 1==
{| border=1 cellpadding=10
!valign = top width=45%|Latin
!valign = top width=55%|English
|- valign = top
|METHAPHISICE ARISTOTILIS LIBER DUODECIMUS

|Aristotle ''Metaphysics'' Book 12 (L)1

|- valign = top
|{{p|246}} De substantia quidem theoria est; nam substantiarum principia et cause quaeruntur.

|'''Chapter 1'''. The subject of our inquiry is substance; for the principles and the causes we are seeking are those of substances.

|- valign = top
|''Et enim si ut totum quoddam'' {{ln|bk1069a20}} omne, substantia est prima pars; et si eo quod consequenter, et ita primum substantia, deinde qualitas aut quantitas.

|For if the universe is of the nature of a whole, substance is its first part; and if it coheres merely by virtue of serial succession, on this view also substance is first, and is succeeded by quality, and then by quantity.

|- valign = top
|Simul [/''Similiter''] ''autem'' nec entia ut est simpliciter dicere haec, sed qualitates et motus, qua et non album et non rectum; dicimus enim esse et haec, ut puta est non album.

|At the same time these latter are not even being in the full sense, but are qualities and movements of it,-or else even the not-white and the not-straight would be being; at least we say even these are, e.g. ''there is a not-white'' .

|- valign = top
|''Amplius nihil'' aliorum separa{{ln|bk1069a25}}bile.

|Further, none of the categories other than substance can exist apart.

|- valign = top
|''Testantur autem'' et antiqui opere; nam substantiae quaerebant principia et elementa et causas. * qui quidem nunc universalia substantias magis ponunt; nam genera universalia, quae dicunt principia et substantias esse magis propter logice inquirere. Qui vero antiquitus particularia, ut ignem et {{ln|bk1069a30}} terram, sed non commune, corpus.

|And the early philosophers also in practice testify to the primacy of substance; for it was of substance that they sought the principles and elements and causes. The thinkers of the present day tend to rank universals as substances (for genera are universals, and these they tend to describe as principles and substances, owing to the abstract nature of their inquiry); but the thinkers of old ranked particular things as substances, e.g. fire and earth, not what is common to both, body.

|- valign = top
|Substantiae vero tres sunt, una quidem sensibilis, cuius alia quidem sempiterna alia corruptibilis, quam omnes * confitentur, ut plante et animalia. * Sempiterna autem, cuius elementa necesse est accipere, sive unum sive multa. Alia vero immo{{p|247}}bilis. Hanc dicunt quidam separabilem esse, hii quidem in duo dividentes, alii in unam naturam species ponentes et mathema{{ln|bk1069a35}}tica, alii horum mathematica solum. Ille quidem naturalis (* cum motu enim), et haec alterius, si nullum ipsis princi{{ln|bk1069b1}}pium commune est.

|There are three kinds of substance-one that is sensible (of which one subdivision is eternal and another is perishable; the latter is recognized by all men, and includes e.g. plants and animals), of which we must grasp the elements, whether one or many; and another that is immovable, and this certain thinkers assert to be capable of existing apart, some dividing it into two, others identifying the Forms and the objects of mathematics, and others positing, of these two, only the objects of mathematics. The former two kinds of substance are the subject of physics (for they ['''69b'''] imply movement); but the third kind belongs to another science, if there is no principle common to it and to the other kinds.

|- valign = top
|''Sensibilis vero substantia mutabilis''. Si autem mutatio est ex oppositis aut mediis, oppositis autem non omnibus (non {{ln|bk1069b5}} album enim * vox), sed ex contrario, necesse subesse quid mutabile in contrarietatem; non enim contraria transmutantur.

|Sensible substance is changeable. Now if change proceeds from opposites or from intermediates, and not from all opposites (for the voice is not-white, (but it does not therefore change to white)), but from the contrary, there must be something underlying which changes into the contrary state; for the contraries do not change.

|}<noinclude>
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
</noinclude>