Difference between revisions of "Chapter 19"

From The Wikipedia POV
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Chapter 19.jpg|thumb|right|260px| She was a woman living in a misogynist world]]
+
[[File:TTLG sockpuppets.jpg|thumb|right|260px| Anyone can create an account – or two – on Wikipedia]]
<blockquote>She stared at the page with a mixture of horror and disbelief. A new misogynistic sexual practice. ''Donkey punch''. Was it for real? Supposedly ‘fucking someone in the ass and then punching them hard in the back of the head or neck, so that the sudden pain and/or unconsciousness causes the asshole to constract spasmodically”.    It affected her so deeply that she burst into tears and slammed the lid of her laptop. It’s not that she hadn’t seen uglier things. “It was that sexualized violence against women is now so normalized that somehow, it’s deemed appropriate to graphically illustrate it on fucking Wikipedia”. She was a woman living in a misogynist world, “a world I’ve watched grow only more deeply misogynist over the course of my adult life”.</blockquote>
 
  
Wikipedia set out with a grand utopian vision, promising power to a community that anyone could join, promising to bring all human knowledge the whole world.  As long as the government, or any other elitist self-elected group did not interfere with the editing process, everything was supposed to work out fine. What went wrong? How did the site that anyone can edit turn into a site that was repulsive to women, and to many other groups and communities in the outside world?
 
  
‘Wikipedia is not censored’ says Wikipedia.  Yet practically everyone in the world accepts age restrictions on pornography, especially extreme pornography. “Only Wikipedia pretends that this is somehow some sort of novel idea, created as a special and inequitable imposition on Wikimedia, that threatens the survival of the civilised world – as though that survival depended on people’s ability to upload their sex-tourism porn made in Thailand and images of their inflated scrotums anonymously”.
+
<blockquote>As he read through the email, he found himself trembling with a mixture of fear and embarrassment, in the way that you can only tremble if your livelihood, your marriage and the respect of your friends and peers are at risk of imminent dissolution. He read it through again. It was scarcely believable.  It was addressed to Andrew Frazer – his real name – at a throwaway googlemail address he used for messing around on the net, and which he had stupidly constructed from his own post code. It was dated 13 September 2008, copied to Cary Bass, a coordinator at the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco.  “Please read what follows and believe it. You have no opening for significant negotiation”.  </blockquote>
 +
 
 +
A British civil servant receives a letter containing a list of threats, including threats of violence, about what will happen if he does not disclose his alternate accounts on Wikipedia and other Wikipedia projectsLater, they call it the ''Anvil'' email. 
 +
 
 +
Anyone can create an account on Wikipedia. Anyone can create ''many'' accounts, called ‘sockpuppets’, and the problem they cause is one of the most serious that afflict the project. This is the story of one of the most extreme attempts used by agents of the Foundation to deter sockpuppeteers: by threats of violence, contacting employers, relatives, and other means of intimidation.  
 +
 
 +
The blackmail works in this case, but its aftermath cogently demonstrates how secrecy begets secrecy. Bad things happen, and are concealed.  Evidence about the concealment emerges later, sometimes years later, and that evidence has to be concealed as well.  Further evidence about the second concealment emerges, involving a third concealment. A progressively wider group of people becomes involved, in a way that begins to resemble a conspiracy.  At some point, enough people know about it for it to become an ‘open secret’.
 +
 
 +
The moral is clear: never edit Wikipedia from work, and never make enemies with its administration.
  
 
<noinclude>
 
<noinclude>
Line 13: Line 19:
  
 
[[Category:Chapters]]
 
[[Category:Chapters]]
 +
[[category:Released]]
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 04:05, 7 March 2018

Anyone can create an account – or two – on Wikipedia


As he read through the email, he found himself trembling with a mixture of fear and embarrassment, in the way that you can only tremble if your livelihood, your marriage and the respect of your friends and peers are at risk of imminent dissolution. He read it through again. It was scarcely believable. It was addressed to Andrew Frazer – his real name – at a throwaway googlemail address he used for messing around on the net, and which he had stupidly constructed from his own post code. It was dated 13 September 2008, copied to Cary Bass, a coordinator at the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. “Please read what follows and believe it. You have no opening for significant negotiation”.

A British civil servant receives a letter containing a list of threats, including threats of violence, about what will happen if he does not disclose his alternate accounts on Wikipedia and other Wikipedia projects. Later, they call it the Anvil email.

Anyone can create an account on Wikipedia. Anyone can create many accounts, called ‘sockpuppets’, and the problem they cause is one of the most serious that afflict the project. This is the story of one of the most extreme attempts used by agents of the Foundation to deter sockpuppeteers: by threats of violence, contacting employers, relatives, and other means of intimidation.

The blackmail works in this case, but its aftermath cogently demonstrates how secrecy begets secrecy. Bad things happen, and are concealed. Evidence about the concealment emerges later, sometimes years later, and that evidence has to be concealed as well. Further evidence about the second concealment emerges, involving a third concealment. A progressively wider group of people becomes involved, in a way that begins to resemble a conspiracy. At some point, enough people know about it for it to become an ‘open secret’.

The moral is clear: never edit Wikipedia from work, and never make enemies with its administration.


See also