http://logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Authors%2FPs-Aquinas%2FSumma_Totius_Logicae%2FTRACTATUS_7%2FCaput_1Authors/Ps-Aquinas/Summa Totius Logicae/TRACTATUS 7/Caput 1 - Revision history2026-10-25T00:30:44ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.17http://logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?title=Authors/Ps-Aquinas/Summa_Totius_Logicae/TRACTATUS_7/Caput_1&diff=5910&oldid=prevNicholas at 18:17, 27 August 20122012-08-27T18:17:28Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 13:17, 27 August 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l16">Line 16:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 16:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Hence, It is necessary to know what is a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">premise</del>.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Hence, It is necessary to know what <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">is the premise. But the premise ,as supposed here, is an assertion. When it was pertained, it was followed from another. For not every premise </ins>is a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">proposition, but only that which is pertained into some species of argumentation, the conclusion follows from that</ins>.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Verbi gratia, cum dicitur: omnis homo est animal, omne risibile est homo, ergo omne risibile est animal; ista omnis homo est animal, est propositio, et similiter illa omne risibile est homo; proponuntur enim ut ad eas sequatur illa omne risibile est animal. Haec autem omne risibile est animal, licet sit enunciatio, constat enim ex terminis, non tamen est propositio. Est autem terminus in quem resolvitur propositio, ut subiectum et praedicatum. Cum enim dico, homo est animal, homo est terminus qui dicitur subiectum; animal est terminus qui dicitur praedicatum.&nbsp;</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Verbi gratia, cum dicitur: omnis homo est animal, omne risibile est homo, ergo omne risibile est animal; ista omnis homo est animal, est propositio, et similiter illa omne risibile est homo; proponuntur enim ut ad eas sequatur illa omne risibile est animal. Haec autem omne risibile est animal, licet sit enunciatio, constat enim ex terminis, non tamen est propositio. Est autem terminus in quem resolvitur propositio, ut subiectum et praedicatum. Cum enim dico, homo est animal, homo est terminus qui dicitur subiectum; animal est terminus qui dicitur praedicatum.&nbsp;</div></td></tr>
</table>Nicholashttp://logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?title=Authors/Ps-Aquinas/Summa_Totius_Logicae/TRACTATUS_7/Caput_1&diff=5908&oldid=prevNicholas at 18:08, 27 August 20122012-08-27T18:08:44Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 13:08, 27 August 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l16">Line 16:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 16:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Hence,<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&nbsp;</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Hence, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">It is necessary to know what is a premise.</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Verbi gratia, cum dicitur: omnis homo est animal, omne risibile est homo, ergo omne risibile est animal; ista omnis homo est animal, est propositio, et similiter illa omne risibile est homo; proponuntur enim ut ad eas sequatur illa omne risibile est animal. Haec autem omne risibile est animal, licet sit enunciatio, constat enim ex terminis, non tamen est propositio. Est autem terminus in quem resolvitur propositio, ut subiectum et praedicatum. Cum enim dico, homo est animal, homo est terminus qui dicitur subiectum; animal est terminus qui dicitur praedicatum.&nbsp;</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Verbi gratia, cum dicitur: omnis homo est animal, omne risibile est homo, ergo omne risibile est animal; ista omnis homo est animal, est propositio, et similiter illa omne risibile est homo; proponuntur enim ut ad eas sequatur illa omne risibile est animal. Haec autem omne risibile est animal, licet sit enunciatio, constat enim ex terminis, non tamen est propositio. Est autem terminus in quem resolvitur propositio, ut subiectum et praedicatum. Cum enim dico, homo est animal, homo est terminus qui dicitur subiectum; animal est terminus qui dicitur praedicatum.&nbsp;</div></td></tr>
</table>Nicholashttp://logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?title=Authors/Ps-Aquinas/Summa_Totius_Logicae/TRACTATUS_7/Caput_1&diff=5906&oldid=prevNicholas at 18:06, 27 August 20122012-08-27T18:06:06Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 13:06, 27 August 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l13">Line 13:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 13:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| And because the syllogism is more perfect than all other [forms of argument], to which other species of argumentation are reduced, as it were from <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre" /></del>imperfect to perfect, therefore we should speak of that. Now the syllogism is defined as follows. &nbsp;A syllogism is a speech in which, with certain things posited and conceded, it is necessary for another thing to come about through the things which are posited and conceded. &nbsp;Speech here is the genus of the syllogism. &nbsp;For as was said&nbsp;in the treatise on assertion, nothing prevents speech being several, and one such is in the syllogism. &nbsp;For, the expression "with certain things posited" refers to the propositions [i.e. premisses] of that syllogism, and the expression "it is necessary for another thing to come about" refers to the conclusion.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| And because the syllogism is more perfect than all other [forms of argument], to which other species of argumentation are reduced, as it were from imperfect to perfect, therefore we should speak of that. Now the syllogism is defined as follows. &nbsp;A syllogism is a speech in which, with certain things posited and conceded, it is necessary for another thing to come about through the things which are posited and conceded. &nbsp;Speech here is the genus of the syllogism. &nbsp;For as was said&nbsp;in the treatise on assertion, nothing prevents speech being several, and one such is in the syllogism. &nbsp;For, the expression "with certain things posited" refers to the propositions [i.e. premisses] of that syllogism, and the expression "it is necessary for another thing to come about" refers to the conclusion.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| </div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Hence,&nbsp;</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Verbi gratia, cum dicitur: omnis homo est animal, omne risibile est homo, ergo omne risibile est animal; ista omnis homo est animal, est propositio, et similiter illa omne risibile est homo; proponuntur enim ut ad eas sequatur illa omne risibile est animal. Haec autem omne risibile est animal, licet sit enunciatio, constat enim ex terminis, non tamen est propositio. Est autem terminus in quem resolvitur propositio, ut subiectum et praedicatum. Cum enim dico, homo est animal, homo est terminus qui dicitur subiectum; animal est terminus qui dicitur praedicatum.&nbsp;</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Verbi gratia, cum dicitur: omnis homo est animal, omne risibile est homo, ergo omne risibile est animal; ista omnis homo est animal, est propositio, et similiter illa omne risibile est homo; proponuntur enim ut ad eas sequatur illa omne risibile est animal. Haec autem omne risibile est animal, licet sit enunciatio, constat enim ex terminis, non tamen est propositio. Est autem terminus in quem resolvitur propositio, ut subiectum et praedicatum. Cum enim dico, homo est animal, homo est terminus qui dicitur subiectum; animal est terminus qui dicitur praedicatum.&nbsp;</div></td></tr>
</table>Nicholashttp://logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?title=Authors/Ps-Aquinas/Summa_Totius_Logicae/TRACTATUS_7/Caput_1&diff=5905&oldid=prevEdward Ockham at 13:39, 25 August 20122012-08-25T13:39:14Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:39, 25 August 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l13">Line 13:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 13:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| And because the syllogism is more perfect than all other [forms of argument], to which other species of argumentation are reduced, as it were from <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">> <</del>/<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">span</del>>imperfect to perfect, therefore we should speak of that. Now the syllogism is defined as follows. &nbsp;A syllogism is a speech in which, with certain things posited and conceded, it is necessary for another thing to come about through the things which are posited and conceded. &nbsp;Speech here is the genus of the syllogism. &nbsp;For as was said&nbsp;in the treatise on assertion, nothing prevents speech being several, and one such is in the syllogism. &nbsp;For, the expression "with certain things posited" refers to the propositions of that syllogism, and the expression "it is necessary for another thing to come about" refers to the conclusion.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| And because the syllogism is more perfect than all other [forms of argument], to which other species of argumentation are reduced, as it were from <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre" />imperfect to perfect, therefore we should speak of that. Now the syllogism is defined as follows. &nbsp;A syllogism is a speech in which, with certain things posited and conceded, it is necessary for another thing to come about through the things which are posited and conceded. &nbsp;Speech here is the genus of the syllogism. &nbsp;For as was said&nbsp;in the treatise on assertion, nothing prevents speech being several, and one such is in the syllogism. &nbsp;For, the expression "with certain things posited" refers to the propositions <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[i.e. premisses] </ins>of that syllogism, and the expression "it is necessary for another thing to come about" refers to the conclusion.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td></tr>
</table>Edward Ockhamhttp://logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?title=Authors/Ps-Aquinas/Summa_Totius_Logicae/TRACTATUS_7/Caput_1&diff=5904&oldid=prevEdward Ockham at 13:38, 25 August 20122012-08-25T13:38:39Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:38, 25 August 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l13">Line 13:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 13:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| And because the syllogism is more perfect than all other [forms of argument], to which other species of argumentation are reduced, as imperfect to perfect, therefore we should speak of that. Now the syllogism is defined as follows. &nbsp;A syllogism is a speech in which, with certain things posited and conceded, it is necessary for another thing to come about through the things which are posited and conceded. &nbsp;Speech here is the genus of the syllogism. &nbsp;For as was said&nbsp;in the treatise on assertion, nothing prevents speech being several, and one such is in the syllogism. &nbsp;For, the expression "with certain things posited" refers to the propositions of that syllogism, and the expression "it is necessary for another thing to come about" refers to the conclusion.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| And because the syllogism is more perfect than all other [forms of argument], to which other species of argumentation are reduced, as <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">it were from <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span></ins>imperfect to perfect, therefore we should speak of that. Now the syllogism is defined as follows. &nbsp;A syllogism is a speech in which, with certain things posited and conceded, it is necessary for another thing to come about through the things which are posited and conceded. &nbsp;Speech here is the genus of the syllogism. &nbsp;For as was said&nbsp;in the treatise on assertion, nothing prevents speech being several, and one such is in the syllogism. &nbsp;For, the expression "with certain things posited" refers to the propositions of that syllogism, and the expression "it is necessary for another thing to come about" refers to the conclusion.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td></tr>
</table>Edward Ockhamhttp://logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?title=Authors/Ps-Aquinas/Summa_Totius_Logicae/TRACTATUS_7/Caput_1&diff=5903&oldid=prevEdward Ockham at 13:38, 25 August 20122012-08-25T13:38:14Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:38, 25 August 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l18">Line 18:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 18:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| </div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| </div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Verbi gratia, cum dicitur: omnis homo est animal, omne risibile est homo, ergo omne risibile est animal; ista omnis homo est animal, est propositio, et similiter illa omne risibile est homo; proponuntur enim ut ad eas sequatur illa omne risibile est animal. Haec autem omne risibile est animal, licet sit enunciatio, constat enim ex terminis, non tamen est propositio. Est autem terminus in quem resolvitur propositio, ut subiectum et praedicatum. Cum enim dico, homo est animal, homo est terminus qui dicitur subiectum; animal est terminus qui dicitur praedicatum. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Sciendum, quod licet propositio ex terminis componatur, et in eis resolvatur</del>; <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">non tamen in definitione termini ponitur compositio propositionis, sed resolutio. Huius causa est: nam logica, ut Boetius in sua topica dicit, duas habet partes: scilicet inventivam, et iudicativam. Est autem inventio excogitatio rerum verarum aut verisimilium, quae alteram partem contradictionis probabilem reddunt. Probabile autem est quod videtur omnibus aut pluribus aut sapientibus, et his scilicet sapientibus, aut omnibus aut pluribus aut maxime notis. Huic autem parti logicae deserviunt duo libri: scilicet topicorum et elenchorum. Iudicium autem, ut hic sumitur, est recta determinatio rationis, in his quorum est iudicium. Recte autem determinat ratio quando principiata resolvit in principia.</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Verbi gratia, cum dicitur: omnis homo est animal, omne risibile est homo, ergo omne risibile est animal; ista omnis homo est animal, est propositio, et similiter illa omne risibile est homo; proponuntur enim ut ad eas sequatur illa omne risibile est animal. Haec autem omne risibile est animal, licet sit enunciatio, constat enim ex terminis, non tamen est propositio. Est autem terminus in quem resolvitur propositio, ut subiectum et praedicatum. Cum enim dico, homo est animal, homo est terminus qui dicitur subiectum; animal est terminus qui dicitur praedicatum.<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&nbsp</ins>;</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| </div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| </div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Sciendum, quod licet propositio ex terminis componatur, et in eis resolvatur; non tamen in definitione termini ponitur compositio propositionis, sed resolutio. Huius causa est: nam logica, ut Boetius in sua topica dicit, duas habet partes: scilicet inventivam, et iudicativam. Est autem inventio excogitatio rerum verarum aut verisimilium, quae alteram partem contradictionis probabilem reddunt. Probabile autem est quod videtur omnibus aut pluribus aut sapientibus, et his scilicet sapientibus, aut omnibus aut pluribus aut maxime notis. Huic autem parti logicae deserviunt duo libri: scilicet topicorum et elenchorum. Iudicium autem, ut hic sumitur, est recta determinatio rationis, in his quorum est iudicium. Recte autem determinat ratio quando principiata resolvit in principia.</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| </div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et ideo scientia quae est recta determinatio scibilium est per causas, scilicet cum ratio resolvit causata in causas: et propterea haec pars logicae, scilicet iudicativa, dicitur analytica seu resolutoria, quia resolvit principiata in principia. Huic autem parti logicae deserviunt duo libri; scilicet priorum et posteriorum.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et ideo scientia quae est recta determinatio scibilium est per causas, scilicet cum ratio resolvit causata in causas: et propterea haec pars logicae, scilicet iudicativa, dicitur analytica seu resolutoria, quia resolvit principiata in principia. Huic autem parti logicae deserviunt duo libri; scilicet priorum et posteriorum.</div></td></tr>
</table>Edward Ockhamhttp://logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?title=Authors/Ps-Aquinas/Summa_Totius_Logicae/TRACTATUS_7/Caput_1&diff=5902&oldid=prevEdward Ockham at 13:37, 25 August 20122012-08-25T13:37:31Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:37, 25 August 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l20">Line 20:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 20:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Verbi gratia, cum dicitur: omnis homo est animal, omne risibile est homo, ergo omne risibile est animal; ista omnis homo est animal, est propositio, et similiter illa omne risibile est homo; proponuntur enim ut ad eas sequatur illa omne risibile est animal. Haec autem omne risibile est animal, licet sit enunciatio, constat enim ex terminis, non tamen est propositio. Est autem terminus in quem resolvitur propositio, ut subiectum et praedicatum. Cum enim dico, homo est animal, homo est terminus qui dicitur subiectum; animal est terminus qui dicitur praedicatum. Sciendum, quod licet propositio ex terminis componatur, et in eis resolvatur; non tamen in definitione termini ponitur compositio propositionis, sed resolutio. Huius causa est: nam logica, ut Boetius in sua topica dicit, duas habet partes: scilicet inventivam, et iudicativam. Est autem inventio excogitatio rerum verarum aut verisimilium, quae alteram partem contradictionis probabilem reddunt. Probabile autem est quod videtur omnibus aut pluribus aut sapientibus, et his scilicet sapientibus, aut omnibus aut pluribus aut maxime notis. Huic autem parti logicae deserviunt duo libri: scilicet topicorum et elenchorum. Iudicium autem, ut hic sumitur, est recta determinatio rationis, in his quorum est iudicium. Recte autem determinat ratio quando principiata resolvit in principia.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Verbi gratia, cum dicitur: omnis homo est animal, omne risibile est homo, ergo omne risibile est animal; ista omnis homo est animal, est propositio, et similiter illa omne risibile est homo; proponuntur enim ut ad eas sequatur illa omne risibile est animal. Haec autem omne risibile est animal, licet sit enunciatio, constat enim ex terminis, non tamen est propositio. Est autem terminus in quem resolvitur propositio, ut subiectum et praedicatum. Cum enim dico, homo est animal, homo est terminus qui dicitur subiectum; animal est terminus qui dicitur praedicatum. Sciendum, quod licet propositio ex terminis componatur, et in eis resolvatur; non tamen in definitione termini ponitur compositio propositionis, sed resolutio. Huius causa est: nam logica, ut Boetius in sua topica dicit, duas habet partes: scilicet inventivam, et iudicativam. Est autem inventio excogitatio rerum verarum aut verisimilium, quae alteram partem contradictionis probabilem reddunt. Probabile autem est quod videtur omnibus aut pluribus aut sapientibus, et his scilicet sapientibus, aut omnibus aut pluribus aut maxime notis. Huic autem parti logicae deserviunt duo libri: scilicet topicorum et elenchorum. Iudicium autem, ut hic sumitur, est recta determinatio rationis, in his quorum est iudicium. Recte autem determinat ratio quando principiata resolvit in principia.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| </div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">|- valign="top"</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">|</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">|</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et ideo scientia quae est recta determinatio scibilium est per causas, scilicet cum ratio resolvit causata in causas: et propterea haec pars logicae, scilicet iudicativa, dicitur analytica seu resolutoria, quia resolvit principiata in principia. Huic autem parti logicae deserviunt duo libri; scilicet priorum et posteriorum.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et ideo scientia quae est recta determinatio scibilium est per causas, scilicet cum ratio resolvit causata in causas: et propterea haec pars logicae, scilicet iudicativa, dicitur analytica seu resolutoria, quia resolvit principiata in principia. Huic autem parti logicae deserviunt duo libri; scilicet priorum et posteriorum.</div></td></tr>
</table>Edward Ockhamhttp://logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?title=Authors/Ps-Aquinas/Summa_Totius_Logicae/TRACTATUS_7/Caput_1&diff=5901&oldid=prevEdward Ockham at 13:35, 25 August 20122012-08-25T13:35:53Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:35, 25 August 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l13">Line 13:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 13:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| And <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">becuase </del>the syllogism is more perfect than all other [forms of argument], to which other species of argumentation are reduced, as imperfect to perfect, therefore we should speak of that. Now the syllogism is defined as follows. &nbsp;A syllogism is a speech in which, with certain things posited and conceded, it is necessary for another thing to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">evenire</del>&nbsp;</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| And <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">because </ins>the syllogism is more perfect than all other [forms of argument], to which other species of argumentation are reduced, as imperfect to perfect, therefore we should speak of that. Now the syllogism is defined as follows. &nbsp;A syllogism is a speech in which, with certain things posited and conceded, it is necessary for another thing to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">come about through the things which are posited and conceded. &nbsp;Speech here is the genus of the syllogism. &nbsp;For as was said</ins>&nbsp;<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">in the treatise on assertion, nothing prevents speech being several, and one such is in the syllogism. &nbsp;For, the expression "with certain things posited" refers to the propositions of that syllogism, and the expression "it is necessary for another thing to come about" refers to the conclusion.</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td></tr>
</table>Edward Ockhamhttp://logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?title=Authors/Ps-Aquinas/Summa_Totius_Logicae/TRACTATUS_7/Caput_1&diff=5900&oldid=prevEdward Ockham at 13:27, 25 August 20122012-08-25T13:27:47Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:27, 25 August 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l13">Line 13:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 13:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| </div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">And becuase the syllogism is more perfect than all other [forms of argument], to which other species of argumentation are reduced, as imperfect to perfect, therefore we should speak of that. Now the syllogism is defined as follows. &nbsp;A syllogism is a speech in which, with certain things posited and conceded, it is necessary for another thing to evenire&nbsp;</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Unde oportet scire quid est propositio. Est autem propositio, ut hic sumitur, enunciatio, qua posita ad eam aliud sequitur: non enim omnis enunciatio est propositio; sed solum illa quae ponitur in aliqua specie argumentationis, ad quam sequitur conclusio.</div></td></tr>
</table>Edward Ockhamhttp://logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?title=Authors/Ps-Aquinas/Summa_Totius_Logicae/TRACTATUS_7/Caput_1&diff=5899&oldid=prevEdward Ockham at 13:20, 25 August 20122012-08-25T13:20:53Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:20, 25 August 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l10">Line 10:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 10:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Modo dicendum est de tertia parte, videlicet de his quae pertinent ad tertiam operationem intellectus. Licet enim, ut dictum est, a philosopho ponantur duae operationes intellectus, scilicet simplicium intelligentia, et compositio vel divisio; tamen additur tertia operatio, quae est discursus ab uno composito vel diviso ad aliud. Hoc autem fit per argumentationem. Est autem argumentatio oratio significativa discursus rationis ab uno cognito ad aliud incognitum, vel a magis incognito ad minus cognitum. Sunt autem argumentationis quatuor species: scilicet syllogismus, enthymema, inductio et exemplum. Sive haec divisio sit generis in suas species, vel analogi in sua analogata, nihil ad propositum.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Modo dicendum est de tertia parte, videlicet de his quae pertinent ad tertiam operationem intellectus. Licet enim, ut dictum est, a philosopho ponantur duae operationes intellectus, scilicet simplicium intelligentia, et compositio vel divisio; tamen additur tertia operatio, quae est discursus ab uno composito vel diviso ad aliud. Hoc autem fit per argumentationem. Est autem argumentatio oratio significativa discursus rationis ab uno cognito ad aliud incognitum, vel a magis incognito ad minus cognitum. Sunt autem argumentationis quatuor species: scilicet syllogismus, enthymema, inductio et exemplum. Sive haec divisio sit generis in suas species, vel analogi in sua analogata, nihil ad propositum.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Now we should speak of the third part, viz., of those matters which pertain to the third operation of the understanding. For although, as was said,&nbsp;</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Now we should speak of the third part, viz., of those matters which pertain to the third operation of the understanding. For although, as was said, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">there are two operations of the understanding posited by the Philosopher, namely the understanding of simples, and composition or division, nevertheless a third operation is added, which is a '''discursus'''</ins>&nbsp;<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">from one composition or division to another. Now this happens through argumentation. &nbsp;Now argumentation is significative speech of the '''discursus''' of reasoning from one thing that is known, to another that is unknown, or from that which is more [known] to that which is less known. &nbsp;Now there are four species of argumentation, namely syllogism, enthymeme, induction and example. &nbsp;But whether this division is of genus into its species, or of the analogy into its analogues, is irrelevant here.</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|- valign="top"</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>| Et quia syllogismus perfectior est omnibus aliis, ad quem aliae species argumentationis reducuntur, sicut imperfectum ad perfectum; ideo de ipso dicendum est. Definitur autem syllogismus sic: syllogismus est oratio in qua quibusdam positis et concessis necesse est aliud evenire per ea quae posita sunt et concessa. Oratio hic est genus syllogismi. Ut enim in tractatu de enunciatione dictum est, nihil prohibet orationem esse plures et unam cuiusmodi est in syllogismo. In hoc autem quod dicit quibusdam positis tangit propositiones ipsius syllogismi: per hoc quod dicit necesse est aliud evenire, tangit conclusionem.</div></td></tr>
</table>Edward Ockham