Authors/Ockham/Summa Logicae/Book I/Chapter 62 - Revision history

Ragnarr49 at 03:42, 22 February 2025

2025-02-22T03:42:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 21 February 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:
	\|- valign="top"		\|- valign="top"
	\| In quo praedicamento ponit talia 'armatum esse', 'calceatum esse' et sic de aliis. Tamen 'habere' secundum Philosophum multis modis dicitur, sicut in Praedicamentis exposui. Alii autem dicunt quod habitus est quidam respectus in ipso corpore circa aliud corpus vel in ipso corpore contento. Et de istis praedicamentis ista sufficiant.		\| In quo praedicamento ponit talia 'armatum esse', 'calceatum esse' et sic de aliis. Tamen 'habere' secundum Philosophum multis modis dicitur, sicut in Praedicamentis exposui. Alii autem dicunt quod habitus est quidam respectus in ipso corpore circa aliud corpus vel in ipso corpore contento. Et de istis praedicamentis ista sufficiant.
	\| In this category he puts such things as ‘to be armed’, ‘to be shod’, and so on. Yet ‘to have’ is predicated in many ways, according to the Philosopher, just as I set out in the ~~<i>~~Categories~~</i>~~. But others say that state is a certain relative in that body, concerning another body or contained in that body. And of these categories, these are sufficient.		\| In this category he puts such things as ‘to be armed’, ‘to be shod’, and so on. Yet ‘to have’ is predicated in many ways, according to the Philosopher, just as I set out in the Categories. But others say that state is a certain relative in that body, concerning another body or contained in that body. And of these categories, these are sufficient.
	\|}		\|}

Ragnarr49 at 03:41, 22 February 2025

2025-02-22T03:41:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 21 February 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:
	\|- valign="top"		\|- valign="top"
	\| Decimum praedicamentum ponitur habitus. Et de isto, sicut de prioribus, dico quod Aristoteles non posuit quod significet aliquam rem distinctam a rebus permanentibus, sed significat quod una res est circa aliam mobilis ad motum ipsius nisi contingat aliquod impedimentum, quae non est pars rei nec simul cum re sed loco et situ distincta a re.		\| Decimum praedicamentum ponitur habitus. Et de isto, sicut de prioribus, dico quod Aristoteles non posuit quod significet aliquam rem distinctam a rebus permanentibus, sed significat quod una res est circa aliam mobilis ad motum ipsius nisi contingat aliquod impedimentum, quae non est pars rei nec simul cum re sed loco et situ distincta a re.
	\| The tenth category is given as state. And of this, ~~just~~ as of the ~~ones before~~, I say that Aristotle did not ~~suppose~~ that it signifies ~~some~~ thing distinct from ~~the~~ permanent things, but ~~rather that it signifies~~ that one thing is ~~moveable~~ around another to ~~a movement of that~~, unless ~~'''contingat aliquod impedimentum'''~~, which is not a part of the thing nor ~~simulaneous with that~~ thing, but distinct in place and situation ~~from the thing~~.		\| The tenth category is given as state. And of this, as of the former, I say that Aristotle did not hold that it signifies any thing distinct from permanent things, but means that one thing is around another moving to its motion, unless it encounters some hindrance, which is not a part of the thing, nor at the same time as the thing, but distinct from the thing in its place and situation.
	\|- valign="top"		\|- valign="top"
	\| In quo praedicamento ponit talia 'armatum esse', 'calceatum esse' et sic de aliis. Tamen 'habere' secundum Philosophum multis modis dicitur, sicut in Praedicamentis exposui. Alii autem dicunt quod habitus est quidam respectus in ipso corpore circa aliud corpus vel in ipso corpore contento. Et de istis praedicamentis ista sufficiant.		\| In quo praedicamento ponit talia 'armatum esse', 'calceatum esse' et sic de aliis. Tamen 'habere' secundum Philosophum multis modis dicitur, sicut in Praedicamentis exposui. Alii autem dicunt quod habitus est quidam respectus in ipso corpore circa aliud corpus vel in ipso corpore contento. Et de istis praedicamentis ista sufficiant.

Ragnarr49 at 03:38, 22 February 2025

2025-02-22T03:38:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 21 February 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:
	\|- valign="top"		\|- valign="top"
	\| Decimum praedicamentum ponitur habitus. Et de isto, sicut de prioribus, dico quod Aristoteles non posuit quod significet aliquam rem distinctam a rebus permanentibus, sed significat quod una res est circa aliam mobilis ad motum ipsius nisi contingat aliquod impedimentum, quae non est pars rei nec simul cum re sed loco et situ distincta a re.		\| Decimum praedicamentum ponitur habitus. Et de isto, sicut de prioribus, dico quod Aristoteles non posuit quod significet aliquam rem distinctam a rebus permanentibus, sed significat quod una res est circa aliam mobilis ad motum ipsius nisi contingat aliquod impedimentum, quae non est pars rei nec simul cum re sed loco et situ distincta a re.
	\| The tenth category is given as ~~‘having’~~. And of this, just as of the ones before, I say that Aristotle did not suppose that it signifies some thing distinct from the permanent things, but rather that it signifies that one thing is moveable around another to a movement of that, unless '''contingat aliquod impedimentum''', which is not a part of the thing nor simulaneous with that thing, but distinct in place and situation from the thing.		\| The tenth category is given as state. And of this, just as of the ones before, I say that Aristotle did not suppose that it signifies some thing distinct from the permanent things, but rather that it signifies that one thing is moveable around another to a movement of that, unless '''contingat aliquod impedimentum''', which is not a part of the thing nor simulaneous with that thing, but distinct in place and situation from the thing.
	\|- valign="top"		\|- valign="top"
	\| In quo praedicamento ponit talia 'armatum esse', 'calceatum esse' et sic de aliis. Tamen 'habere' secundum Philosophum multis modis dicitur, sicut in Praedicamentis exposui. Alii autem dicunt quod habitus est quidam respectus in ipso corpore circa aliud corpus vel in ipso corpore contento. Et de istis praedicamentis ista sufficiant.		\| In quo praedicamento ponit talia 'armatum esse', 'calceatum esse' et sic de aliis. Tamen 'habere' secundum Philosophum multis modis dicitur, sicut in Praedicamentis exposui. Alii autem dicunt quod habitus est quidam respectus in ipso corpore circa aliud corpus vel in ipso corpore contento. Et de istis praedicamentis ista sufficiant.
	\| In this category he puts such things as ‘to be armed’, ‘to be shod’, and so on. Yet ‘to have’ is predicated in many ways, according to the Philosopher, just as I set out in the <i>Categories</i>. But others say that ~~‘holding’~~ is a certain relative in that body, concerning another body or contained in that body. And of these categories, these are sufficient.		\| In this category he puts such things as ‘to be armed’, ‘to be shod’, and so on. Yet ‘to have’ is predicated in many ways, according to the Philosopher, just as I set out in the <i>Categories</i>. But others say that state is a certain relative in that body, concerning another body or contained in that body. And of these categories, these are sufficient.
	\|}		\|}

Edward Ockham at 18:29, 24 November 2013

2013-11-24T18:29:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 24 November 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Nextpage\|[[../Chapter 61\|Chapter 61]]\|[[../Chapter 63\|Chapter 63]]}}		{{Nextpage\|[[../Chapter 61\|Chapter 61]]\|[[../Chapter 63\|Chapter 63]]}}


	{\| border="1" cellpadding="10"		{\| border="1" cellpadding="10"

Edward Ockham at 18:24, 7 December 2011

2011-12-07T18:24:48Z

New page

{{Nextpage|[[../Chapter 61|Chapter 61]]|[[../Chapter 63|Chapter 63]]}}

{| border="1" cellpadding="10"
|-
! valign="top" width="45%" | Latin
! valign="top" width="55%" | English
|- valign="top"
| '''[CAP. 62. DE PRAEDICAMENTO HABITUS]'''
| '''[Chapter 62. On the category of having]'''
|- valign="top"
| Decimum praedicamentum ponitur habitus. Et de isto, sicut de prioribus, dico quod Aristoteles non posuit quod significet aliquam rem distinctam a rebus permanentibus, sed significat quod una res est circa aliam mobilis ad motum ipsius nisi contingat aliquod impedimentum, quae non est pars rei nec simul cum re sed loco et situ distincta a re.
| The tenth category is given as ‘having’. And of this, just as of the ones before, I say that Aristotle did not suppose that it signifies some thing distinct from the permanent things, but rather that it signifies that one thing is moveable around another to a movement of that, unless '''contingat aliquod impedimentum''', which is not a part of the thing nor simulaneous with that thing, but distinct in place and situation from the thing.
|- valign="top"
| In quo praedicamento ponit talia 'armatum esse', 'calceatum esse' et sic de aliis. Tamen 'habere' secundum Philosophum multis modis dicitur, sicut in Praedicamentis exposui. Alii autem dicunt quod habitus est quidam respectus in ipso corpore circa aliud corpus vel in ipso corpore contento. Et de istis praedicamentis ista sufficiant.
| In this category he puts such things as ‘to be armed’, ‘to be shod’, and so on. Yet ‘to have’ is predicated in many ways, according to the Philosopher, just as I set out in the <i>Categories</i>. But others say that ‘holding’ is a certain relative in that body, concerning another body or contained in that body. And of these categories, these are sufficient.
|}

== Notes ==

{{reflist}}

[[Category:Unchecked translations]]