Authors/Henry of Ghent/Quodlibeta/Quodlibet I/Quaestio 23 - Revision history

Edward Ockham at 11:30, 17 September 2011

2011-09-17T11:30:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:30, 17 September 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	\|- valign="top"		\|- valign="top"
	\| Tertia quaestio proponebatur sine argumento, et ideo breviter dicendum ad ipsam, quod in parvulis omnibus originale peccatum aequale est et aequalis poena ei debetur in omnibus, poena damni scilicet, ut carentiae divinae visionis, quae est pura privatio, in qua non cadunt magis et minus, nulla autem sensus, in qua magis et minus locum habere possunt. Et ideo, cum, ut iam dictum est, parvulo decedente sine baptismo, in nullo suffragantur secundum communem legem merita aut fides parentum, aequalis erit damnatio et poena parvuli fidelis discedentis sine baptismo et Sarraceni.		\| Tertia quaestio proponebatur sine argumento, et ideo breviter dicendum ad ipsam, quod in parvulis omnibus originale peccatum aequale est et aequalis poena ei debetur in omnibus, poena damni scilicet, ut carentiae divinae visionis, quae est pura privatio, in qua non cadunt magis et minus, nulla autem sensus, in qua magis et minus locum habere possunt. Et ideo, cum, ut iam dictum est, parvulo decedente sine baptismo, in nullo suffragantur secundum communem legem merita aut fides parentum, aequalis erit damnatio et poena parvuli fidelis discedentis sine baptismo et Sarraceni.
	\| The third question was put forward without an argument, and thus it should briefly be said to it that in all children, original sin is equal, and there is an equal punishment owing for it in all, namely the punishment of the damned, as of the lacking of the vision of the divine, which is pure privation, in which greater and less does not fall, and which is no sensation (in which greater and less can have a place).  And ~~therefore,~~ since, as was already said, when a child departs life [''decedentis''] without baptism, neither merit [''merita''] nor the faith of the parents support them in anything, according to the common law, the damnation and the punishment of the child of the faithful dying [''discedentis''] without baptism will be equal.		\| The third question was put forward without an argument, and thus it should briefly be said to it that in all children, original sin is equal, and there is an equal punishment owing for it in all, namely the punishment of the damned, as of the lacking of the vision of the divine, which is pure privation, in which greater and less does not fall, and which is no sensation (in which greater and less can have a place).  And since, as was already said, when a child departs life [''decedentis''] without baptism, neither merit [''merita''] nor the faith of the parents support them in anything, according to the common law, therefore the damnation and the punishment of the child of the faithful dying [''discedentis''] without baptism will be equal.
	\|}		\|}

Edward Ockham at 11:29, 17 September 2011

2011-09-17T11:29:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:29, 17 September 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	\|- valign="top"		\|- valign="top"
	\| Tertia quaestio proponebatur sine argumento, et ideo breviter dicendum ad ipsam, quod in parvulis omnibus originale peccatum aequale est et aequalis poena ei debetur in omnibus, poena damni scilicet, ut carentiae divinae visionis, quae est pura privatio, in qua non cadunt magis et minus, nulla autem sensus, in qua magis et minus locum habere possunt. Et ideo, cum, ut iam dictum est, parvulo decedente sine baptismo, in nullo suffragantur secundum communem legem merita aut fides parentum, aequalis erit damnatio et poena parvuli fidelis discedentis sine baptismo et Sarraceni.		\| Tertia quaestio proponebatur sine argumento, et ideo breviter dicendum ad ipsam, quod in parvulis omnibus originale peccatum aequale est et aequalis poena ei debetur in omnibus, poena damni scilicet, ut carentiae divinae visionis, quae est pura privatio, in qua non cadunt magis et minus, nulla autem sensus, in qua magis et minus locum habere possunt. Et ideo, cum, ut iam dictum est, parvulo decedente sine baptismo, in nullo suffragantur secundum communem legem merita aut fides parentum, aequalis erit damnatio et poena parvuli fidelis discedentis sine baptismo et Sarraceni.
	\| The third question was put forward without an argument, and thus it should briefly be said to it that in all children, original sin is equal, and there is an equal punishment owing for it in all, namely the punishment of the damned, as of the lacking of the vision of the divine, which is pure privation, in which greater and less does not fall, and which is no sensation (in which greater and less can have a place).  And therefore, since, as was already said, when a child departs life [''decedentis''] without baptism, neither merit [''merita''] nor the faith of the parents support them in anything, the damnation and the punishment of the child of the faithful dying [''discedentis''		\| The third question was put forward without an argument, and thus it should briefly be said to it that in all children, original sin is equal, and there is an equal punishment owing for it in all, namely the punishment of the damned, as of the lacking of the vision of the divine, which is pure privation, in which greater and less does not fall, and which is no sensation (in which greater and less can have a place).  And therefore, since, as was already said, when a child departs life [''decedentis''] without baptism, neither merit [''merita''] nor the faith of the parents support them in anything, according to the common law, the damnation and the punishment of the child of the faithful dying [''discedentis''] without baptism will be equal.
	\|}		\|}

Edward Ockham at 11:28, 17 September 2011

2011-09-17T11:28:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:28, 17 September 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}

	[[Category:~~Unchecked_scans~~]]		[[Category:Unchecked translations]]

Edward Ockham at 10:57, 17 September 2011

2011-09-17T10:57:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:57, 17 September 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|- valign="top"		\|- valign="top"
	\| [176] '''[QUAESTIO 23 UTRUM PARVULUS ISTE AEQUALEM POENAM SUSTINEAT PRO SUO ORIGINALI CUM PARVULO SARRACENI]'''		\| [176] '''[QUAESTIO 23 UTRUM PARVULUS ISTE AEQUALEM POENAM SUSTINEAT PRO SUO ORIGINALI CUM PARVULO SARRACENI]'''
	\| '''[Whether that child receives an equal punishment for his original sin as the child of a Sarracen]'''		\| '''[Whether that child receives an equal punishment for his original sin as the child of a Sarracen<ref>I.e. an Arab, and by implication a Muslim</ref>]'''
	\|- valign="top"		\|- valign="top"
	\| Tertia quaestio proponebatur sine argumento, et ideo breviter dicendum ad ipsam, quod in parvulis omnibus originale peccatum aequale est et aequalis poena ei debetur in omnibus, poena damni scilicet, ut carentiae divinae visionis, quae est pura privatio, in qua non cadunt magis et minus, nulla autem sensus, in qua magis et minus locum habere possunt. Et ideo, cum, ut iam dictum est, parvulo decedente sine baptismo, in nullo suffragantur secundum communem legem merita aut fides parentum, aequalis erit damnatio et poena parvuli fidelis discedentis sine baptismo et Sarraceni.		\| Tertia quaestio proponebatur sine argumento, et ideo breviter dicendum ad ipsam, quod in parvulis omnibus originale peccatum aequale est et aequalis poena ei debetur in omnibus, poena damni scilicet, ut carentiae divinae visionis, quae est pura privatio, in qua non cadunt magis et minus, nulla autem sensus, in qua magis et minus locum habere possunt. Et ideo, cum, ut iam dictum est, parvulo decedente sine baptismo, in nullo suffragantur secundum communem legem merita aut fides parentum, aequalis erit damnatio et poena parvuli fidelis discedentis sine baptismo et Sarraceni.

Edward Ockham at 10:56, 17 September 2011

2011-09-17T10:56:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 17 September 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	! valign="top" width="55%" \| English		! valign="top" width="55%" \| English
	\|- valign="top"		\|- valign="top"
	\| [176] '''[QUAESTIO 23 UTRUM PARVULUS ISTE AEQUALEM POENAM SUSTINEAT PRO SUO ORIGINALI CUM PARVULO SARRACENI]'''		\| [176] '''[QUAESTIO 23 UTRUM PARVULUS ISTE AEQUALEM POENAM SUSTINEAT PRO SUO ORIGINALI CUM PARVULO SARRACENI]'''
	\| '''[Whether that child receives an equal punishment for his original sin as the child of a Sarracen]'''		\| '''[Whether that child receives an equal punishment for his original sin as the child of a Sarracen]'''
	\|- valign="top"		\|- valign="top"
	\| Tertia quaestio proponebatur sine argumento, et ideo breviter dicendum ad ipsam, quod in parvulis omnibus originale peccatum aequale est et aequalis poena ei debetur in omnibus, poena damni scilicet, ut carentiae divinae visionis, quae est pura privatio, in qua non cadunt magis et minus, nulla autem sensus, in qua magis et minus locum habere possunt. Et ideo, cum, ut iam dictum est, parvulo decedente sine baptismo, in nullo suffragantur secundum communem legem merita aut fides parentum, aequalis erit damnatio et poena parvuli fidelis discedentis sine baptismo et Sarraceni.		\| Tertia quaestio proponebatur sine argumento, et ideo breviter dicendum ad ipsam, quod in parvulis omnibus originale peccatum aequale est et aequalis poena ei debetur in omnibus, poena damni scilicet, ut carentiae divinae visionis, quae est pura privatio, in qua non cadunt magis et minus, nulla autem sensus, in qua magis et minus locum habere possunt. Et ideo, cum, ut iam dictum est, parvulo decedente sine baptismo, in nullo suffragantur secundum communem legem merita aut fides parentum, aequalis erit damnatio et poena parvuli fidelis discedentis sine baptismo et Sarraceni.
	\| The third question was put forward without an argument, and thus it should briefly be said to it that in all children, original sin is equal, and there is an equal punishment owing for it in all, namely the punishment of the damned ...		\| The third question was put forward without an argument, and thus it should briefly be said to it that in all children, original sin is equal, and there is an equal punishment owing for it in all, namely the punishment of the damned, as of the lacking of the vision of the divine, which is pure privation, in which greater and less does not fall, and which is no sensation (in which greater and less can have a place).  And therefore, since, as was already said, when a child departs life [''decedentis''] without baptism, neither merit [''merita''] nor the faith of the parents support them in anything, the damnation and the punishment of the child of the faithful dying [''discedentis''
	\|}		\|}

	== Notes ==		== Notes ==

	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}

	[[Category:Unchecked_scans]]		[[Category:Unchecked_scans]]

Edward Ockham at 10:06, 17 September 2011

2011-09-17T10:06:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:06, 17 September 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Nextpage\|[[../Quaestio 22\|Quaestio 22]]\|[[../Quaestio 24\|Quaestio 24]]}}		{{Nextpage\|[[../Quaestio 22\|Quaestio 22]]\|[[../Quaestio 24\|Quaestio 24]]}}
	~~{\| border=1 cellpadding=10~~
	~~!valign = top width=45%\|Latin~~
	~~!valign = top width=55%\|English~~
	~~\|- valign = top~~
	~~\|[176] QUAESTIO 23 UTRUM PARVULUS ISTE AEQUALEM POENAM SUSTINEAT PRO SUO ORIGINALI CUM PARVULO SARRACENI~~

	\|		{\| border="1" cellpadding="10"
			\|-
			! valign="top" width="45%" \| Latin
			! valign="top" width="55%" \| English
			\|- valign="top"
			\| [176] '''[QUAESTIO 23 UTRUM PARVULUS ISTE AEQUALEM POENAM SUSTINEAT PRO SUO ORIGINALI CUM PARVULO SARRACENI]'''
			\| '''[Whether that child receives an equal punishment for his original sin as the child of a Sarracen]'''
			\|- valign="top"
			\| Tertia quaestio proponebatur sine argumento, et ideo breviter dicendum ad ipsam, quod in parvulis omnibus originale peccatum aequale est et aequalis poena ei debetur in omnibus, poena damni scilicet, ut carentiae divinae visionis, quae est pura privatio, in qua non cadunt magis et minus, nulla autem sensus, in qua magis et minus locum habere possunt. Et ideo, cum, ut iam dictum est, parvulo decedente sine baptismo, in nullo suffragantur secundum communem legem merita aut fides parentum, aequalis erit damnatio et poena parvuli fidelis discedentis sine baptismo et Sarraceni.
			\| The third question was put forward without an argument, and thus it should briefly be said to it that in all children, original sin is equal, and there is an equal punishment owing for it in all, namely the punishment of the damned ...
			\|}

	~~\|- valign~~ = ~~top~~		== Notes ==
	\|Tertia quaestio proponebatur sine argumento, et ideo breviter dicendum ad ipsam, quod in parvulis omnibus originale peccatum aequale est et aequalis poena ei debetur in omnibus, poena damni scilicet, ut carentiae divinae visionis, quae est pura privatio, in qua non cadunt magis et minus, nulla autem sensus, in qua magis et minus locum habere possunt. Et ideo, cum, ut iam dictum est, parvulo decedente sine baptismo, in nullo suffragantur secundum communem legem merita aut fides parentum, aequalis erit damnatio et poena parvuli fidelis discedentis sine baptismo et Sarraceni.

	\|		{{reflist}}

	\|}		[[Category:Unchecked_scans]]
	~~==Notes==~~
	~~{{reflist}}~~
	[[Category:~~Unchecked scans~~]]

Edward Ockham: Created page with "{{Nextpage|Quaestio 22|Quaestio 24}} {| border=1 cellpadding=10 !valign = top width=45%|Latin !valign = top width=55%|English |- valign = to..."

2011-09-14T18:52:37Z

Created page with "{{Nextpage|[[../Quaestio 22|Quaestio 22]]|[[../Quaestio 24|Quaestio 24]]}} {| border=1 cellpadding=10 !valign = top width=45%|Latin !valign = top width=55%|English |- valign = to..."

New page

{{Nextpage|[[../Quaestio 22|Quaestio 22]]|[[../Quaestio 24|Quaestio 24]]}}
{| border=1 cellpadding=10
!valign = top width=45%|Latin
!valign = top width=55%|English
|- valign = top
|[176] QUAESTIO 23 UTRUM PARVULUS ISTE AEQUALEM POENAM SUSTINEAT PRO SUO ORIGINALI CUM PARVULO SARRACENI

|

|- valign = top
|Tertia quaestio proponebatur sine argumento, et ideo breviter dicendum ad ipsam, quod in parvulis omnibus originale peccatum aequale est et aequalis poena ei debetur in omnibus, poena damni scilicet, ut carentiae divinae visionis, quae est pura privatio, in qua non cadunt magis et minus, nulla autem sensus, in qua magis et minus locum habere possunt. Et ideo, cum, ut iam dictum est, parvulo decedente sine baptismo, in nullo suffragantur secundum communem legem merita aut fides parentum, aequalis erit damnatio et poena parvuli fidelis discedentis sine baptismo et Sarraceni.

|

|}
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Unchecked scans]]