Edward Ockham: Text replace - "\\<\/span\>" to "{{p|$1|$1}}"

2014-09-05T21:38:04Z

Text replace - "\<span id=p(.*)\>\<\/span\>" to "{{p|$1|$1}}"

New page

{{Nextpage|[[../P2Q1| Part 2 Q1]]|[[../P2Q3|Part 2 Q3]]}}

Translated by [[Peter Simpson]].

{| border=1 cellpadding=10
!valign = top width=45%|Latin
!valign = top width=55%|English
|- valign = top
|'''Quaest. 2'''
|

|- valign = top
|{{a|n197|197}} Iuxta hoc quaero utrum sint tantum tres personae in essentia divina. Arguo quod non: Relationes oppositae sunt aequalis dignitatis; ergo si relatio primi producentis tantum constituit unam personam, correspondebit sibi alia relatio tantum constituens personam unam productam, et ita tantum erit una persona producta.

|197. Next I ask whether there are only three persons in the divine essence. I argue that there are not: Opposite relations are of equal dignity; therefore if the relation of the first producer constitutes only one person, there will correspond to it another relation constituting only one produced person, and so there will be only one produced person.

|- valign = top
|{{a|n198|198}} Praeterea, duabus relationibus productarum correspondent duae producentium, et aeque distinguuntur ista extrema inter se sicut illa; ergo si istae duae relationes productarum constituant duas personas, et aliae duae constituent alias duas, et ita erunt quattuor personae divinae.

|198. Further, to two relations of things produced there correspond two relations of thing producing and these latter extremes are distinguished as equally among themselves as the former are; therefore if those two relations of produced things constitute two persons, the other two will also constitute two persons, and so there will be four divine persons.

|- valign = top
|{{a|n199|199}} Praeterea, potentia finita durans in infinitum posset habere successive effectus infinitos, sicut patet de sole secundum viam Philosophi II De generatione; ergo potentia infinita potest habere {{p|251|251}}infinita producta simul. Consequentia probatur, quia quod potentia finita non possit simul in tot in quot potest successive, hoc est propter finitatem propter quam pro nunc iste effectus sibi adaequatur; igitur infinita in quot potest successive in tot potest simul; successive potest in infinita, patet, quia finita potest sic in infinita.

|199. Further, a finite power lasting for an infinite time could have successively infinite effects, as is plain about the sun according to the way of the Philosopher ''On Generation and Corruption'' 2.10.336a23-337a33, 11.337b25-338b19; therefore an infinite power can have infinite produced things all at once. The proof of the consequence is that the fact a finite power is not able to do all at once as many things as it can do successively is because of the finitude because of which this effect here is for the present enough for it; therefore an infinite power can do all at once all the things it can do successively; it can do infinite things successively, as is plain, because a finite power can thus do infinite things.

|- valign = top
|{{a|n200|200}} Oppositum ostenditur Matth. ultimo: In nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti; et I Ioan. 5: Tres sunt qui testimonium dant in caelo etc.; et Augustinus De fide ad Petrum cap. 2; et ponitur in littera.

|200. The opposite is shown in the last chapter of Matthew 28.19: “In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit;” and in I John 5.7: “There are three that give testimony in heaven etc.;” and Augustine [in fact Fulgentius] On the Faith to Peter ch.1 n.5, and it is in the text [sc. of the ''Sentences''].

|}
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Checked by translator]]

Authors/Duns Scotus/Ordinatio/Ordinatio I/D2/P2Q2 - Revision history

Edward Ockham: Text replace - "\\<\/span\>" to "{{p|$1|$1}}"