Edward Ockham at 09:44, 23 December 2013

2013-12-23T09:44:00Z

New page

{{Nextpage|[[../D1|Dist. 1]]|[[../D3|Dist. 3]]}}

'''First part: On the existence of God and his unity'''

*[[/Q1|Question 1]] Whether among beings there is an actually infinite being (Main arguments, nn.1-9)
*Question 2: Whether something infinite is known self-evidently
**[[/Q2A|2A]] Main arguments for the second question (nn.10-14), with replies (nn.15-38)
**[[/Q2B|2B]] To the first question (n.39) and the existence of the relative properties of an infinite being (n.41-n.73)
**[[/Q2C|2C]] Preliminary conclusions on the existence of an infinite being (n.74 – n.110)
**[[/Q2D|2D]]The infinity of God is proved directly (nn.111-156)
*[[/Q3| Question 3]] Whether there is only one God (nn.157-190)
'''Second Part: On the persons and productions in God'''

*[[/P2Q1|Question 1]] Whether there can be along with the unity of the divine essence a plurality of persons
*[[/P2Q2|Question 2]] Whether there are only three persons in the divine essence
*[[/P2Q3|Question 3]] Whether the being of being produced can stand in something along with the divine essence
*[[/P2Q4|Question 4]]: Whether in the divine essence there are only two intrinsic productions (nn.212-219)
*To the third question (Scotus’ own proofs and proofs of others ([[/P2Q4B|nn.220-257]])
**To the main arguments of the third question ([[/P2Q4C|nn.258-269]])
*To the fourth question
**The opinion of Henry of Ghent ([[/P2Q4D|nn.270-299]])
**Scotus’ opinion, including objections ([[/P2Q4E|nn.300-326]])
**To the main arguments of the fourth question ([[/P2Q4F|nn.327-352]])
*To the second question ([[/P2Q4G|nn.353-375]])
*To the first question (n.376)
**Clarification of Scotus’ own solution ([[/P2Q4H|nn.377-387]])
**On the formal distinction ([[/P2Q4I|nn.388-410]])
**To the main arguments of the first question ([[/P2Q4J|nn.411-439]])

Authors/Duns Scotus/Ordinatio/Ordinatio I/D2 - Revision history

Edward Ockham at 09:44, 23 December 2013